AAS, or angle-angle-side, states that if two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and non-included side of a second triangle, then the triangles are congruent. We have an angle and a side.Nov 29, 2017
1) 8.2 times 7
2)5.2 times 4
3)4.1 times 4
1) 57.4
2)20.8
3)16.4
Greatest:57.4
Least:16.4
Answer:57.4-16.4=41
Answer:
a) 0.64mm
b) 7/25
Step-by-step explanation:
Felipe trabaja en una construcción ayuda a cotizar materiales entre ellos cables para diversos propósitos.El arquitecto le pidió cotizar un cable de 16/25 mm de diámetro. en los catálogos disponibles en as tiendas las medidas aparecen expresadas en números decimales como se muestra en la imagen
¿Que debe hacer felipe para saber el diámetro del cable que pidió el arquitecto?
¿que medida en forma de fracción le corresponde al cable que mide 0.28? ¿como lo determinaste? es urgenteeee GRACIAS
a)Para que obtengamos la medida del material expresada como decimal, usaremos el método de división larga. compruebe el archivo adjunto para la solución a la división.
16/25 mm = 0,64 mm
b) La medida fraccionaria corresponde al cable que mide 0.28 se expresa como se muestra. Convertir 0,28 a fracción.
0.28 = 28/100 (Tenga en cuenta que dividimos por 100 porque hay dos valores decimales después del punto decimal)
Sobre la simplificación en su término más bajo
0.28 = 28/100 = 2*14/2*50
0.28 = 28/100 = 14/50
simplificando aún más
0.28 = 14/50 = 2*7/2*25
0.28 = 14/50 = 7/25
28/100 = 7/25
Por lo tanto, la medida fraccionaria que corresponde al cable que mide 0.28 es 7/25.
Answer:
see graph
Step-by-step explanation:
g(x) = 3^ x .
h(x) = 2^-x
We want to subtract them
f(x) = 3^x - 2^(-x)
I will rewrite without the negative exponent
f(x) = 3^x - (1/2)^(x)
Lets pick a couple of points
f(0) = 3^0 - (1/2) ^ 0 = 1-1 = 0
As x gets large 3^x gets large and 1/2^x gets close to 0, so it will get large
As x goes to negative infinity, 3^x goes to zero and 1/2^ gets large so we get - infinitity
Here we want to see which one of the given graphs is the one with the correct relationship between distance in centimeters and meters. We will see that the correct option is the first graph.
<h3>Working with changes of scale.</h3>
So we know that each centimeter on the map must represent 4 meters in reality, this is a change of scale, so the scale is:
1cm = 4m
First, this relation is linear (each centimeter will always be equal to 4 meters) so the two bottom options that are not linear can be discarded, so we only have the first and second graph.
If you read them, you can see that in the second one 1 meter is equivalent to something near 5 cm, so this is also incorrect.
The only graph that shows a correct scale is the first one, where for each increment of 1 unit on the horizontal axis (the one in centimeters) we have an increase of 4 m (estimated). This means that 1cm = 4m, as in our change of scale.
So the correct option is the first graph.
If you want to learn more about changes of scale, you can read:
brainly.com/question/9302261