Answer:
a. $800
b. $1,000
Explanation:
In this case, the opportunity cost of holding the money instead of buying a U.S. Treasury bond is determined as the yearly interest payed by the bond.
a. interest rate = 8%
The opportunity cost of keeping the $10,000 is:
b. interest rate = 10%
The opportunity cost of keeping the $10,000 is:
Answer:
A growing company may not be earning any profits yet, but may nevertheless provide a great investment opportunity.
Other times, a lack of profitability can be a huge red flag that something is wrong with the firm.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is $ 300
Explanation:
because by subtracting 1,500 - 1,200 it gives us 250 and the only one who gives us a similar pressure is multiply (1,500) (. 20) it gives us 300
Answer:
B. Maybe. The FTC would scrutinize the merger and make a case-by-case decision.
Explanation:
If we considered the historical guidelines of FTC for the merger purpose so may be FTC could permit the merger between the two firms that could result in HHI of 1,025 after the merger as the merger represent the moderal level of the concentration in the market area so here FTC should analyzes the merger with cash to cash basis
Therefore the option b is correct
Answer:
These two statements are correct:
A. Businesses and jobs rely most strongly on consumer demand.
B.Government regulation is necessary to stabilize the economy.
Explanation:
The first statement is correct because John Maynard Keynes that demand was the most important side of the economy, not supply. This is why his policies are sometimes referred to as "demand-side economics", while the policies of many of his detractors, such as Milton Friedman, are referred to as "supply-side economics".
The second statement is also correct because Keynes believed that a market economy was naturally subject to business cycles: cycles of boom and bust that could either benefit millions, or harm millions. Keynes thought that the government should regulate the economy in order to lessen the effect of those cycles.
