Try B not sure but that’s my guess
Answer:
Personal opinion.
Explanation:
It depends. If you feel by giving up some of your freedom for protectin and promises from the government, you would see it is fair. It is an even exchange between the people and the government.
You could also argue the government does not hold up their end of the contract, making it unfair. You would need examples to back up.
Personally, I think it is fair, as long as both sides hold up their end of the contract.
For the sentence “This course deals with the facts that
everyone should know”, the adjective clause is “that everyone should know”. In
the given sentence the main clause is “This course deals with facts”. The adjective
clause is actually describing the main clause. Adjective clause is a clause
that is mainly used to describe the main clause or a noun or a pronoun. So
adjective clauses are actually subordinate clauses having the sole purpose of
describing the main clause of the sentence.
What is the document about?
A few years ago I had an English teacher that encouraged "The Oreo Method"; it compares effective constructive criticism to an Oreo cookie.
The filling in the middle was the constructive criticism, but before and after that, you offer positive feedback for the writer.
Pretty self explanatory:
1. Provide one piece of positive feedback first and linger on it for a couple sentences; let them know how important that "thing" is and, in a way, praise them for doing it. This primes them to accept your feedback cause they know how thoroughly you've read and analyzed their work.
2. Offer any and all of the constructive criticism you have; stay subtle and be concise with all your feedback.
3. Offer more positive feedback, as many good things as you can come up with.
By submerging the constructive criticism between positive feedback, you keep their hopes up while still thoroughly conveying weak spots in their work.
I hope this kinda made sense; it's a very self explanatory idea so I had trouble elaborating on it.
