Pataliputa to the Khyber Pass is 2644 miles the closest out of answer choices is 1500 miles.
Hi!
So I answered this same exact question for someone a little while ago, I hope you don't mind I just copied my answer for them.
1a.) A Greek drama is a is a play which was performed in ancient Greece, most notably the tragedies.
1b.) The actors in Greek theater were called hypocrites, I believe. The Greek spelling the was "hypokrites"
1c.) The Greek word "hypokrite" is a compound word which translates to "an interpreter from underneath." This is because they performed while their faces were hidden underneath giant masks so the ancient audiences could easily tell characters apart. More information can be found here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/hypocrite-meaning-origin
1d.) aside from the actors there was a chorus, which explained necessary information to the audience, usually in song form. Eventually this evolved to be a more active role in the plays.
1e.) The plays were performed in open air theaters (theatron), the most famous of which is at the acropolis in Athens. They were shaped like a bowl for acoustics.
They also had parts 2-4 on there but I wasn't confident enough in my history of Ancient Greece to answer parts 3 & 4.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/12015061#readmore
Answer:
B
Explanation:
the lincoln house was divided because of the debate between Northern and shouthern slavery
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.
Explanation:
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law
.
Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.