1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OleMash [197]
3 years ago
6

How are a concurring opinion and a dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court case different?

History
2 answers:
forsale [732]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<u>A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.  </u> i hope i helped OwU

<u></u>

Explanation:

Tems11 [23]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.

Explanation:

Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law .

Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.

You might be interested in
The most important part of being a citizen is having the right to vote. throughout american history, many changes were made to t
inessss [21]
The answer is Aaaaaa
8 0
3 years ago
Which ancient civilization was the largest in area?
olga_2 [115]
Answer:
i think it is C sorry if i got it wrong.
if it is not that than it might be A

6 0
2 years ago
What is Diamond’s explanation for the inequality between New Guinea and other parts of the world?
andrew11 [14]
Diamond realized that Yali’s question penetrated the heart of a great mystery of human history -- the roots of global inequality.

Why were Europeans the ones with all the cargo? Why had they taken over so much of the world, instead of the native people of New Guinea? How did Europeans end up with what Diamond terms the agents of conquest: guns, germs and steel? It was these agents of conquest that allowed 168 Spanish conquistadors to defeat an Imperial Inca army of 80,000 in 1532, and set a pattern of European conquest which would continue right up to the present day.

Diamond knew that the answer had little to do with ingenuity or individual skill. From his own experience in the jungles of New Guinea, he had observed that native hunter-gatherers were just as intelligent as people of European descent -- and far more resourceful. Their lives were tough, and it seemed a terrible paradox of history that these extraordinary people should be the conquered, and not the conquerors.

To examine the reasons for European success, Jared realized he had to peel back the layers of history and begin his search at a time of equality – a time when all the peoples of the world lived in exactly the same way.
4 0
2 years ago
How do we see the moon if it does not produce light ?
tatiyna

Hello!

We are able to see the moon because the sun shines light onto it. Depending on the location of the moon around the Earth, we can see more or less of it at different times. When the moon is directly across from the sun, we can see a full moon. When the sun is behind the moon, no light is reflecting onto it. This results in a new moon.

I hope this helps you!

-Mal

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was not one of the goals of the marshall plan?
jolli1 [7]

Answer: Which of the following was not one of the goals of the Marshall Plan? Answer Expert Verified. A: to make Europe the most powerful continent. The Marshall Plan did not have as an objective the making of Europe as the most powerful continent, as it was a plan designed to help Europe in a moment of great need after the atrocity of the world war II.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • As a result of economic growth during the 1950s, the percentage of Americans who were in the middle class
    14·1 answer
  • Which was the first country to ratify the united nations general assembly answers
    15·1 answer
  • What was the point of the 17th parallel.
    6·1 answer
  • What was the name of the contested fur Rich Farmland where the French would trade manufactured goods to American Indians for fur
    13·1 answer
  • What was the outcome of the first Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT)?
    7·1 answer
  • Why was the French Revolution a major turning point in Western History?
    12·1 answer
  • What modern country with more Muslims than any other country
    5·1 answer
  • This is science btw.
    5·2 answers
  • Who do you think is the intended audience of this speech?
    6·2 answers
  • King louis went from being referred to being beheaded. What actions did he take that contributed to his fate?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!