How are a concurring opinion and a dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court case different?

History

2 answers:

forsale [732]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

<u>A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it. </u> i hope i helped OwU

<u></u>

Explanation:

Tems11 [23]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.

Explanation:

Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law .

Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.

You might be interested in

After the communist victory in its civil war, china embraced an economy wherein private property and private ownership of capita

scoundrel [369]

All of the statements are examples of collective ownership in the socialist countries.
Collective ownership, at it's core, represents ownership of something, most commonly land and industrial assets, from all members of a group for the mutual benefit of all. This was implemented in most of the socialistic countries, but still the main and dominant owner was usually the government itself, while the people had shares in most of the industries and land.

4 0

3 years ago

What were the results of increased production in the united states during world war i? whap ch. 29?

docker41 [41]

It i war and we gatta win,

8 0

2 years ago

What did stalin do when he became dictator

Leto [7]

Answer:

<h2>He served as the General Secretary of the Central</h2><h2>Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet</h2><h2>Union from 1922 until his death in 1953. In the years</h2><h2>following the death of Vladimir Lenin, he became the</h2><h2>dictator of the Soviet Union, by manipulating and</h2><h2>terrorizing others in order to destroy his opponents.</h2>

4 0

2 years ago

Who were the people in Washington's cabinet

weeeeeb [17]

Thomas Jefferson<span>, </span>Alexander Hamilton, Henry Knox<span>,and </span>Edmund Randolph<span>.
I hope this helps Thank u for using Brainly have a great day </span>

5 0

3 years ago

The jay treaty was signed with?<br> France<br> Germany<br> Canada<br> Spain<br> England

Katena32 [7]

Answer:

England

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers