1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OleMash [197]
3 years ago
6

How are a concurring opinion and a dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court case different?

History
2 answers:
forsale [732]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<u>A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.  </u> i hope i helped OwU

<u></u>

Explanation:

Tems11 [23]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.

Explanation:

Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law .

Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.

You might be interested in
Under the articles of confederation congress did not have the authority
vazorg [7]
False, though congress had little power it was still some power
8 0
3 years ago
(please help me out!!)
Strike441 [17]

Green revolution refers to the drastic increase in food production during 1960s in the developing countries.

Two intended outcomes: 1. HYV seeds enhance the productivity level. 2. Use of modern machinaries promote huge yield per unit of land.

Two unintended outcomes: 1. Loss of soil fertility. 2. Increase of salinity in under ground water.

Explanation:

In 1960s green revolution brought a drastic change in India's agricultural pattern. Yield per unit of land increase rapidly. It introduced the use of modern machineries, pesticide & weedicides in the crop land, HYV (High yielding variety) seeds etc.

Besides due to green revolution pollution level rise up, salinity level in the ground water increases and even the soil fertility level decreases. Huge and frequent use of pesticides and insecticides promotes soil erosion and crop rotation, multiple cropping system reduces soil fertility level.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the woman's rights movement begin in the united states
Bingel [31]

Answer:

During the 1850s, the women's rights movement gathered steam, but lost momentum when the Civil War began. ... In 1869, a new group called the National Woman Suffrage Association was founded by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony. They began to fight for a universal-suffrage amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anti-Federalists argued that ?
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. Many felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen.
6 0
3 years ago
Select the European Axis powers in World War II.
IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

German, Italy and Japan.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were tribute empires?
    11·1 answer
  • What kind of family does King Jesus have?
    5·1 answer
  • PLZ ANSWER THE QUESTION ​
    12·1 answer
  • How did people resist moves by the Einsatzgruppen??
    8·1 answer
  • Gandhi was an extremely violent leader and his protest movement resulted in the death of many true or false
    8·2 answers
  • In the current taxonomic system as proposed by Woese and Fox, the level that includes the largest number of organisms would be a
    8·1 answer
  • What strategy did world leaders use to prevent future international conflicts
    7·1 answer
  • List four different decisions that Custer made before and/or during the Battle. Explain why you think he made each of those deci
    15·2 answers
  • What do the financial problems tell you about why a<br> government needs to have the power to tax?
    8·1 answer
  • What was one effect of the Great Awakening?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!