Answer:
(This is an opinionated question so there actually is no right or wrong answer. I will put what <em>I </em>would have answered, and you can change it up it's not what you would put :] )
Explanation:
I would have chosen more peaceful tactics. Though it's true that the Soviet Union may have went against any peace treaties as they have plenty of times, it's ultimately a better option than spending all our time and money, that could be better spent on other things within our country, on stockpiling weapons. It has been useful in being a reminder to other countries not to test the U.S., but it's also cost a lot of money that could be put towards better causes.
I hope this helped :)
Kipling is pro colonialism. He thinks that colonialism is important for the empire.
At the age of 14 they became a squire
Answer:
1. I think it would limit, but not end.
2. They threaten with military force, and mobilizing national guard.
3. Smartphones can be used to expose racism- especially phone cameras. News outlets can report videos captured by citizens by playing it and reporting the event's whereabouts.
Please brainliest
Answer: Great Britain and France
Explanation: The French and Indian War began over the specific issue of whether the upper Ohio River valley was a part of the British Empire, and therefore open for trade and settlement by Virginians and Pennsylvanians, or part of the French Empire.
