Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: Relational switching cost.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept known as <em>''switching cost'' </em>in the field of business, basically refers to all the costs involved in the procedure of switching from a supplier to a new one. Moreover, this term also involves many different types, such as financial switching costs, procedural switching costs and relational switching costs.
To continue, the third one, <em>the relational switching cost</em> refers to the situation where a company has changed its supplier and a big loss of identification and emotional bonds changed as well with it. Furthermore, when relational switching costs take place the personal relationships between the people involved in the transactions of the company are lost and that generates an impact in the new relationships with the new supplier.
Answer:
Mark−up percentage = 18.75%
Explanation:
Total manufacturing cost= Direct material + Direct labor + Variable overhead + Fixed overhead
= $36 + $24 + $18 + $40
= $118
Hence, the total manufacturing cost is $118.
Total selling cost = Fixed selling cost + Variable selling cost
Total selling cost = $28 + $14
Total selling cost = $42
Hence, the total selling cost is $42
Total cost = Total Manufacturing cost + Total selling cost
Total cost = $118 + $42
Total cost = $160
Mark−up percentage = ROI / Total cost * 100
Mark−up percentage = $30 / $160 * 100
Mark−up percentage = 0.1875 * 100
Mark−up percentage = 18.75%
Answer: 1. real GDP declined.
Explanation:
If labor productivity fell yet the workforce did not increase, that means that for Years 1 and 2, workers were producing less than they were producing before because the same number of people were producing.
This means that the amount of goods produced in the country would reduce and therefore GDP would reduce as well as GDP is the amount of goods and services produced in a country. If labor productivity had fallen yet the work-hours had increased, the increase in worker hours would have made up for the loss of labor productivity.
Answer:
no ❤️️
Explanation:
No❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️ ❤️️
Answer:
6.75%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Beta of the stock = 1.12
Expected return = 10.8% = 0.108
Return of risk free asset = 2.7% = 0.027
Now,
Since it is equally invested in two assets
Therefore,
both will have equal weight = 
= 0.5
Thus,
Expected return on a portfolio = ∑(Weight × Return)
= [ 0.5 × 10.8% ] + [ 0.5 × 2.7% ]
= 5.4% + 1.35%
= 6.75%
