The financial meltdown of 2008 was in part due to <u>quants </u>demonstrating the dangers of relying too heavily on the quantitative techniques of scientific management.
<h3>How did the financial meltdown of 2008 happen?</h3>
There were several reasons for the financial meltdown that the United States saw in 2008 and one of them was the overreliance on Quants.
Quants were quantitative models that were used to decide on the financial assets to invest in. They failed to predict the risks associated with Mortgage Backed Securities and this contributed in part to the meltdown.
Find out more on the financial meltdown of 2008 at brainly.com/question/25664180
#SPJ1
The correct answer is choice b.
Managerial Economics deals specifically with the application of economic concepts, theories, tools, and methodologies in order to solve practical problems in a business. This definition aligns with choice b, which is to provide logic and methodology to find solutions to business problems.
Answer:
Debit Unearned Fees, $8,370
Credit Fees Earned, $8,370
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the Company received the amount of $33,480 from Santa Fe for 36 month on April 1 in which we are to assumed that the adjustments will be made at the year end this means that the adjusting entry will be to:
Debit Unearned Fees, $8,370
Credit Fees Earned, $8,370
Calculated as :
Amount received $33,480/36 months ×9 months
=$8,370
Note that from 1st April to 31st December will give us 9 months.
Answer:
The future value of the $200 invested yearly for 4 years at 8% is $973.32
Explanation:
The future value of an immediate annuity is given by the formula = (1+r)*[P*((1+r)^n-1)/r]
P=is the periodic payment of $200
r=rate of return=8 percent
n=number of years=4
By slotting the variables into the formula we have:
Fv=(1+0.08)*(200*((1+0.08)^4-1)/0.08)
FV=$973.32
Judging by the concept of time value of money, it is expected that the sum invested at interest would have been much more at maturity of the investment as $1 today should give a lot more than $1 in future.
Answer:
d. the Circular Flow Model
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this statement is an example of the Circular Flow Model. This model (like mentioned in the question) illustrates the flow of cash from different people or company's in different industries. Where one person/company pays another, which takes it in as income and uses that to pay another company for what they need and so on.