All categories

2 years ago

Please help will mark brainly

Mathematics

2 answers:

spin [16.1K]2 years ago

8 0

80/3 = 26 2/3

ANSWER IS (A)

blagie [28]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:26 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

6 2/3 x 4

(3 x 6 +2)/3 x 4

20/3 x 4

(20 x 4)/3

80/3=26 2/3

You might be interested in

A manufacturer uses production method to produce steel rods. A random sample of 17 steel rods resulted in lengths with a standar

Arisa [49]

Answer:

$\chi^2 =\frac{17-1}{12.15} 22.09 =15.87$

Traditional method

We can find a critical value in the chi square distribution with df =16 who accumulates $\alpha/2 =0.05$ of the area on each tail and we got:

$\chi^2_{crit}= 7.962$

$\chi^2_{crit}=26.296$

Since the calculated value is between the two critical values we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true deviation is NOT significantly different from 3.5 cm

Confidence level method

We can find the p value like this

$p_v =2*P(\chi^2 >15.87)=0.92$

Since the p value is higher then the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is NOT significantly different from 3.5 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Data provided

$n=17$ represent the sample selected

$\alpha=0.1$ represent the significance

$s^2 =4.7^2 =22.09$ represent the sample variance

$\sigma^2_0 =3.5^2 =12.15$ represent the value to check

Null and alternative hypothesis

We want to verify if the new production method has lengths with a standard deviation different from 3.5 cm, so the system of hypothesis would be:

Null Hypothesis: $\sigma^2 = 12.15$

Alternative hypothesis: $\sigma^2 \neq 12.15$

The statistic for this case is given by:

$\chi^2 =\frac{n-1}{\sigma^2_0} s^2$

The degrees of freedom are:

$df =n-1= 17-1=16$

$\chi^2 =\frac{17-1}{12.15} 22.09 =15.87$

Traditional method

We can find a critical value in the chi square distribution with df =16 who accumulates $\alpha/2 =0.05$ of the area on each tail and we got:

$\chi^2_{crit}= 7.962$

$\chi^2_{crit}=26.296$

Since the calculated value is between the two critical values we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true deviation is significantly different from 3.5 cm

Confidence level method

We can find the p value like this

$p_v =2*P(\chi^2 >15.87)=0.92$

Since the p value is higher then the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is significantly different from 3.5 cm

7 0

2 years ago

Question 4

stealth61 [152]

Question 4:
2x-3
Because we don’t know how much Fernando has that would be where we fill in the variable giving you 2x then 3 dollars less will give you the -3 therefore 2x-3
Question 5:
1/2x+7
Because we don’t know Deb’s age that would be the variable and we are looking for half of Deb’s age giving you 1/2x then the 7 years more giving you the +7 hence 1/2x+7

3 0

2 years ago

Select the table representing a linear function. (Graph them if necessary.)

laiz [17]

Answer is C because there is a constant rate of change (+2) in the y-values. As x increases by 1, y increases by 2.

3 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the quotient of 5/6 divided 2/12

Alex17521 [72]

Answer: 60/12 or 5

Step-by-step explanation: Find the reciprical of 2/12. That is 12/2. Then, multiply 5/6 and 12/2. 12x5 is 60 and 6x2 is 12.