I believe television is more effective than radio because, television provide a visual image of certain things, and people find visuals more appealing and favorite more than listening to someone speaking. The images tend to capture the mind of the viewer causing them to be more attracted to a certain thing, causing it to have a greater influence on public opinion. For example, If Pepsi chose to create an advertisement in a radio by just simply stating that it's refreshing and saying that you should buy it. But Coca Cola chose to make an ad on TV by showing people enjoying the drink by the pool in a summer day, you are more likely to chose Coke because it appealed to you more than Pepsi. So I think that's why Television is more effective in influencing public opinion than a radio.
Hope this helps you
Answer:
The Supreme Court refuses to take a case on legislation that permits the president to launch military strikes without congressional approval.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court refuses to take a case on legislation that permits the president to launch military strikes without congressional approval.
Answer:
yeah
oofer gang but my girl finna make me act up
This is FALSE. I say this because a hypothesis is a statement which is not universally true. More research has to be carried out for it to become a law. Which is a proven fact. Hope i helped. Have a nice day.
