Answer:
B.
Explanation:
negotiating executive agreements with a new nation
<span>According to the passage included in this question, the reason that the Byzantines wanted Bilisarius to stake everything in a single battle against the Goths was that they had hope this would prevent them from starving to death. This is evidenced by the reference to them having 'no more grain'.</span>
Answer:
No this is not legal due to the Second Amendment of the Constitution. This states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The second amendment was tested recently with the Supreme Court case DC v. Heller, where the Court ruled that a ban on handguns in Washington, D.C. was unconstitutional. So the government cannot ban all sales of firearms and destroy guns at will (this would probably be logistically impossible as well), due to the right to carry a firearm for self defense.
Answer:
Dred Scott would continue to be enslaved.
Explanation:
The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories. This was determine before the Dred Scott case, therefore Dred Scott is considered still enslave, since the permitting of slavery in both the North and the South.
