Answer:
analysis paralysis
Explanation:
Analysis paralysis: The term "analysis paralysis" is also referred as "paralysis by analysis" and is described as a process in which an individual or a group of people tends to overthink or overanalyze a particular situation that can cause or leads to "forward motion" or the decision-making process becomes 'paralyzed' i.e, no course of action or solution is being decided upon.
In the question above, Kenneth is most likely experiencing the phenomenon known as 'analysis paralysis'.
Rivers were attractive locations for the first civilizations because they provided a steady supply of drinking water and made the land fertile for growing crops. Moreover, goods and people could be transported easily, and the people in these civilizations could fish and hunt the animals that came to drink water.
I hope this helps!
Washington was concerned that the United States was too weak to become entangled in European affairs; and in 1793 he declared that the United States would stay strictly neutral. As such, the United States would support neither Britain nor France.
Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
