<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the second one, having to do with that fact that each faced foreign invasions, since neither had in place a sufficient defense system. </span></span>
Answer:
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
Answer:
Leviticus 24-44:46.
Explanation:
The Hebrew Bible mentions few rules and regulations for maintaining slaves and how to treat them. Some provisions of the Hebrew Bible talks about setting slaves free after specific years while some talks about keeping them for generations.
The provision that might discourage many Hebrew slaves from seeking their freedom would be through the contents of Leviticus 24-44:46 of the Hebrew Bible. It says that slaves can be acquired from other nations or from one's own land itself if one wills to do so. The slaves that one acquire become one's private property and can be inherited to one's children.
This interprets that slaves have no right to become free if the owner does not wants to set them free. Instead they can be inherited by the owner's children as their property.
Answer: Oil Embargo, 1973–1974. During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiation
Explanation:
