Answer:
Well, first you'll have to identify themes of their rule.
Style of rule -
NII was obviously an autocrat (even though he, in theory anyway, had a representative body of the peoples, the Duma. But he hung onto his absolute rule with the Fundamental Laws (1905)), and Lenin had spoke alot of 'dictatorship of the proletariat,' both pretty absolute.
Repression (secret police, censorship) -
NII had the Okhrana, and tried to continue his father's 'Reaction.' Secret police for the
purpose of preserving the status quo, keeping the Tsars in power.
Lenin's Cheka was far more efficient, and though the total amount of the Cheka's victims in the civil war are officially 12,000 and something(wiki it), historians widely believe this figure to be in excess 500,000. Lenin therefore could be judged as the worse of the two.
Reform -
- NII - Illusory Reform (October Manifesto created the Duma, and as mentioned, this had no real authority),
- Stolypin's land reforms did almost nothing. Lenin issues the Workers Control Decree, and also
- the Bolshevik Land Decree - however these were only very temporary (before a return to a very
- authoritarian economic set-up (strict discipline etc). These therefore could also be judged as illusory.
Similarities-
- Both used concessions/reform in order to maintain control. Nicholas with the October Manifesto and
the creation of the Duma and Lenin with the NEP to appease the SR's and the rightists of the Bolsheviks.
- They both 'backtracked' on the reforms however with Lenin calling the NEP a 'tactical retreat' and would've
- reverted it had he been alive and Nicholas made the 1906 constitution/ Fundamental laws which limited the Duma's powers and maintained his position as an autocrat.
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
- Congress should have the authority to decide all issues.
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
Both Lincoln and Johnson's arrangement needed a brisk re-affirmation for the South.
Johnson's arrangement wasn't as eager to give as much opportunity to recently free slaves as Lincolns seemed to be.
In contrast to Johnson's arrangement, the arrangement they had needed to rebuff the south.
The Radical Republicans needed to rebuff the south to leave. They needed to remove the ex-confederates/supporters appropriate to cast a ballot. They considered it the Iron Clad Oath. They offered the most security to the liberated slaves, of each of the three plans, however they moan to generally profit white Northerners. They likewise looked to make a Black Code.
Answer:
Christianity, Buddhism, and Islam.
Explanation:
these three religions are universalizing religions meaning they try to convert as many people as possible globally. Hinduism, and Confucianism and ethnic meaning they tend to stick to a specific area or group of people and don't usually convert as large a scale as a universalizing religion.
The answer is:
<span>People who settled in the cities atop mountains.
</span>-Apex
