The precinct might throw all of its support behind a candidate to help the candidate win
I would feel betrayed because I really thought him being the president would make things better. But if he would he would leave many people in poverty and wouldn’t be fair
They are unrelated. Present day traditionalists are attached to guaranteeing that the Second Amendment was made so the nationals could oppose oppression and help battle to protect the Constitution, including the First Amendment. It wasn't. This is revisionist history. It was made to keep Congress and Congress alone from restricting the privilege to remain battle ready, which would keep the states from setting up local armies utilizing residents' weapons.
Actually, the states dependably had the ability to direct guns any way they needed, in light of the fact that at first, the Second Amendment didn't make a difference to them by any means. They likewise had the ability to confine discourse and the press et cetera, on the grounds that the First Amendment didn't have any significant bearing to them either.
They believed this because the British harshly collected taxes from the poor peasants and forcefully occupied their land which caused wide disturbance in village economy
Answer:
it could mean like what the moral of the story is
Explanation:
