Answer:
Explanation:
African-American Homer Plessy (1862-1925) with his <em>plaintiff in Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1882), was an inspiring figure for the generations of the Civil Rights Movement. Plessy bought a first-class ticket in East Louisiana Railroad and sat in the "whites only" section. Stating he was 1/8 black only -since he was mixed and actually his great-grandmother was the one originally from Africa, he remained seated until expelled from the train and taken to jail. He was freed only paying the bailout of $500.
After his 13th and 14th amendment rights were violated, he took the case to court where <em>Judge John Howard Ferguson</em> presiding. Plessy was found guilty. Later on, in 1896 the case was taken to the U.S. Supreme Court but the final decision was not any different.
Answer:
1.Don't make speeches that are too long
2.don't think too big
3.don't make short requests
Many colonies were established by people who were exiled because of their religious beliefs. A group known as the Puritans wanted to reform the Church of England. In the early 1600s, the Puritans were respected professionals who were influential in England.
Answer:
The best answer is A historian who claims the Boxer Rebellion followed directly from the actions of external colonial powers.
In order to understand this question, let us investigate what counterclaim means. It means a claim made to invalidate a previous claim. In this context, our answer needs to have, in its context a structure that goes against what the first historian said.
A historian who claims the Boxer Rebellion followed directly from the actions of external colonial powers - True - By giving a total antagonist cause for the rebellion, a cause that sustains itself with no connection to the previous argument, this case qualifies as a counterclaim for the first historian.
B. A historian who shares a diary entry from a Chinese woman who lost her crops to drought - False - This argument contributes to the original argument, showing a case that supports the historian.
C. A historian who offers evidence that Christians were targeted during the Boxer Rebellion - False - This claim only indicates the possible targets of the Boxer Rebellion, knowing the first claim is about the reason for the rebellion, it does not qualify as a counterclaim.
D. A historian who shows that harvest yields declined in the years before the Boxer Rebellion - False - This argument reinforces the first historian argument, showing one possible cause for the massive drought and famine in China.