Answer:
1. allows the narrator to exaggerate
Explanation:
Authorial reticence is lack of clear conclusion or opinions about an event. It allows the narrator to exaggerate and escape the judgement. The readers does not prefer authorial reticence as there is absence of clear judgement. There author can include fantasies and magics which will end up readers concluding things their own way. It leaves readers in the state of uncertainty and clear conclusion is not given right way.
It was banned due to the profanity in the book.
Because of his robust can<span>, </span>Satan does not suppose<span> Hell </span>is that the<span> worst </span>issue<span>. The worst </span>issue<span> to him is his freedom being taken from him.</span>
<span>Satan and his angels </span>are bound<span> to the burning lake </span>of fireside<span> in Hell. </span>Satan will solely<span> look </span>facet<span> to </span>facet<span>, and </span>once<span> he </span>appearance<span> up he sees. </span>within the literary work<span>, the setting </span>is that the<span> "fiery gulf". The Gulf represents Hell </span>close to<span> the lake </span>of the fireside<span>. </span>they are bound<span> down next to the lake.</span>
Anton Chekhov's naturalism
Aristotle's tragedy
Clifford Odet'sagit-prop
Thornton Wilder's expressionism
I put four hopefully this helps
