Well, the Americans were fighting in common territory. the British were fighting on foreign land. The British had [plenty of food, good uniforms, trained commanders and new rifles and supplies. The American officer had fairly the same training as British officers. In the French& Indian war, such ones as Washington and Israel Putnam had fought extraordinarily in that war. The rebels used guerrilla fighting in the areas where they could easily maneuver and escape. Also, one British army was required to fight over one large area as opposed to numerous groups of Continental forces.
Rebels also had disadvantages such as no government and no real means of funding its forces. But it had motivation. Unlike the British, they were fighting for their families and rights. They had good lines of communication and numerous routes of escape in the case of defeat. Also, Britain was at odds with many European countries, who eagerly lent aid with the great victories won by the Americans
I'm pretty sure that the best answer is: <span>These photographs of 19th-century life on the Great Plains indicate that</span> (2)Native American Indians and white settlers adapted differently to the same environment.
Well, the new sense of identity led the colonist to have a desire for independence. They viewed themself as independent from Britain, as their own nation pretty much. The British Crown misunderstood that the colonists increasingly saw themselves as a separate people, due to their own voice in their own affairs. The American war for independence was partly a product of the colonists' sense of a distinctive identity as inhabitants of a republican society. But the revolution also helped to nurture a sense of a uniquely American identity. The Revolution was a colonial war for independence, but it was also a struggle over "who would rule at home."
Its a form of resistance training
