Answer:
The answer is A. The US acquired new overseas territories, leading to increased trade.
Explanation:
Before the SPAM War started, Cuba was attempting to launch a revolution from the Spanish to gain their independence. America saw this and became allies with the chain of islands under Spanish control. However, the US did not want to initiate warfare unless acts of war were put against them, per the "Big Stick Policy" by Teddy Roosevelt. The war was finally initiated when Yellow Journalism, when newspapers exaggerated stories, caused Americans to jump to conclusion that the SS Maine, in Havana Cuba, was sunk by the Spanish. (It was later discovered that it was an engine explosion on behalf of human error). Anyway, the Cubans got their chance at independence when America decided to join them in battle. After the war was won, Cubans gained their independence and the US got the rest of the islands (The Phillippines, Guatemala, etc.). This allowed American ships to have naval bases, increase manufacturing and trade, and allow for easier shipping for materials that could be traded in Western continents.
Hope This Helped!
PLZZ Give Me Brainliest So I can Level Up!
<u>Answer:</u>
The strong politics of radical reconstruction was largely ineffective in changing the attitudes of White southerners towards African Americans because the white southerners were not mentally ready to accept African Americans as socially equal human beings.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The efforts taken by radical Republicans in the 1860s and 1870s in order to establish a society without the prevalence of racial discrimination mostly proved unsuccessful.
- The fact that the African Americans were relieved from slavery forever angered most white southerners and culminated in violent clashes between the two.
Answer:
Several reforms began, most of them ineffective. Many today view his time as a leader as a reign of terror.
B, destroying the Roman Empire. Although the Greek Civilization was technologically advanced, destroying the Roman Empire was one of their biggest achievements.
Answer:
We must evaluate the performance of a candidate in a debate through the relevance and construction of his arguments and his oratory capacity.
Explanation:
The debate is a way of finding out about a certain topic, through the ability of two or more individuals to argue and speak.
With this, we can affirm that the best way to evaluate the performance of a candidate in a debate is through the construction of arguments and the supporting evidence, assessing whether the candidate presents relevant, true and proven information to build an effective argument. The oratorical capacity of the candidate is also important. This must always be calm, integral, fluent and with a good diction.
