Answer:
a. introduction
Explanation:
of a proposal begins with a capsule statement.
Answer:
Crimson may not be able to deduct any of the cost incurred. In other words these expenses are inadmissible.
Explanation:
As per scenario given in the above question, Crimson Inc., may not be able to deduct any cost which is incurred related to the entertainment expenses because many changes has been made in the tax cuts and Jobs act,2017. These changes does not allowed deduction of the entertainment and business meals expenses.
In the year 2018, the entertainment expenses could not be deducted according to the tax laws applicable on the companies. Thus, the costs will not be deducted.
Answer:
Manson will incur a loss of $10,300 by buying the part.
Explanation:
Purchases = 10,300 * $6 = $61,800
Variable cost = 10,300 * $5 = $51,500
Fixed cost = 10,300 * $3 = $30,900
Analysis:
<u>Details Make ($) Buy ($) Net ($)
</u>
Purchase 0 61,800 61,800
Variable 51,500 0 51,500
Fixed 30,900 30,900 <u> 0 </u>
Loss <u> 10,300 </u>
Therefore, Manson will incur a loss of $10,300 by buying the part.
The correct option is (a) sales; average book value of fixed assets.
The fixed asset turnover ratio is computed as sales divided by average book value of fixed assets.
The fixed asset turnover ratio demonstrates the effectiveness of a company's current fixed assets in driving sales. A greater ratio suggests that management is making better use of its fixed assets. No information can be gleaned from a high FAT ratio about a company's capacity to produce reliable earnings or cash flows.
The ratio of sales to the value of fixed assets is known as fixed-asset turnover. It shows how effectively the company is generating sales by utilizing its fixed assets.
A greater ratio is typically preferred since it suggests that the business is effective at producing sales or revenues from its asset base. A lower ratio suggests that a business is not utilizing its resources effectively and may be experiencing internal issues.
Learn more about fixed asset turnover ratio
brainly.com/question/24085720
#SPJ4
Answer:
gain surplus from paying a lower price
Explanation:
An effective price ceiling will cause consumers to "gain surplus from paying a lower price."
This is based on the idea that an effective price ceiling usually leads to prices being below the equilibrium price or equates to a lower price.
At this point, the buyers demand more of the products, while the sellers have a lower incentive to produce more. And therefore, the quantity demanded will exceed the quantity supplied.
Hence, consumers gain excess (more demands) by paying a lower price.
