Answer:
Not sure but can narrow it down
Explanation:
I don't have enough info to be sure about the answer. I don't know if there is an article or passage to read. If there is, please upload it so I can help you further. I think the answer should be either the first choice or the last choice. If you want to persuade readers that huskies sometimes steal food from humans, in order to compare the consequences, it could be to open up someone's eyes as to what they are doing is wrong. It would be like asking a thief, how would you feel if a husky snatched your filet mignon off of your plate? They would hopefully see that it wouldn't feel good, therefore they shouldn't steal because it will hurt someone else.
The option that says they want to persuade readers that humans and huskies are treated as equals, in my opinion, means that if we would give consequences to a dog such as scolding him, a human should also receive some sort of consequence.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, or further references, we can say the following.
The key detail that is missing in the summary is that Phillip decided to pay close attention to Henry's clues so that he would know exactly when to place Henry in his bed.
It is correct to say that Phillip adopted Henry from the humane society. Immediately, Phillip trained Henry to sleep in his own bed. Philip was effective in training Henry because he followed the advice of using consistency with love. But we have to add the important fact that Phillip decided to pay close attention to Henry's clues so that he would know exactly when to place Henry in his bed.
That was an important factor in the learning process because that is how Philip realized what the dog was trying to tell him with its actions, and according to the training manual, mutual understanding between the owner and the pet, is very important.
Metropolitan Area Network <span />
