Students will eat all of their lunches instead of throwing them away. Lunches would cost more money. Students learn better when
they aren't hungry. If more people bought lunches, more people would need to be hired. Students will want to come to school for the good lunches. Students only want junk food. Which of these arguments would you use if you were writing a paper for better school lunches?
Students learn better when they aren't hungry. Which leads to a healthier and more knowledgeable community (knowledge is power). When these students graduate they will be able to work and provide more, physically and mentally. Thus making the community as a whole more enriched and profitable.
Your answer would be A. Nature implies suspicions of others but does not state it, while Society and Solitude states directly that suspicions of others is natural.
