Ask question

Ask question

All categories

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

2 years ago

11

According to The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, what happens as a result of the British destroying the French fleet anchored near

Alexandria? HURRY WILL REWARD FIRST TO ANSER BRANLEIST

1 answer:

Soloha48 [4]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Napoleon, his army, and the scholars become trapped in the land they have just conquered.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

9 people are playing a modded game

abruzzese [7]

Question:

Nine people are playing a Among Us mod

they are trying to find out who the Imposter is

This is a hardcore Among Us mod

Mods: Jester, Detective, Sheriff, the Imposters can morph, a hint, and the Imposters can do tasks.

Hint: The Jester is not Pink nor Black and the Sheriff is Blue

Answers to choose from:

a. blue said look at me and die my gun will kill you imposters

b. black said I don't have any visual task

c. pink said orange is imposter without proof

d. orange said I saw jester/imposter near a body (but he didn't)

e. purple said pink is safe she did scan.

f. white said wait imposter can do task when I saw teals body blues footprints was all over it

g. blue said wai- wh- hu- hang o-

h. green said wait morph imposter can morph

I. brown said how do you know....

People who could be the Imposter: brown, orange, and white

People who are not Imposters: black, green, pink, and blue

Purple: ???????

Answer:

Orange, Brown or White could be the Imposters.

White is the letter f,

Brown is the letter I,

and Orange is the letter d.

Explanation:

Brown - who would say how did you know that. That is kind of telling us he could be or is the Imposter.

Purple - We don't know to much about Purple. Purple could be the Jester or the Imposter or a Crewmate. We would need more information to specify who Purple is. Pink is safe and she did the scan.

White - White said "wait imposters can do task then how come I saw Blues footprints on one of them." It says that the Imposters Can Do Tasks. This information is telling us that White could be or is the Imposter.

Orange - Orange said that he saw the jester/imposter near a body, but he didn't specify what color it was, if he actually did see the someone near a body he would have known what color the killer was. He would also have told the others (unless he was the Imposter).

Blue - Blue said "look at me and die my gun will kill you imposters

." Blue is the Sheriff because only the Sheriff's will have a gun but the Imposters will have a knife.

Pink - Purple said she saw Pink do the MedBay Scan, but did Pink see Purple, I don't know and we will never know because we don't have that information. Pink said orange was the Imposter without any proof.

Black - Black is the Detective because they don't have visual tasks.

Green - Green said "wait morph imposter can morph.

" That is telling you that he did not know Imposters could morph, so that means he is not one of the Imposters.

My Questions:

Is the Jester the same thing as the Imposter?

Can there be more than one Imposter?

Is there anything we are missing?

Is there anything to help us find out who the Imposter is?

How many Imposters are there?

3 0

2 years ago

What things does the speaker say Alfred cannot do, and what remarkable thing he can do? hugging the jukebox

MAXImum [283]

Answer:

Speaker Is a thing to listen to music, news, and alerts u can use it

6 0

1 year ago

The narrator states that the characters live on twenty dollars a week. What other clues does the author give to describe the eco

Alenkinab [10]

The author shows how the characters' apartment was humble and built with cheap material, in addition, the author shows that the characters were very thin, as they didn't buy enough food.

<h3>How does the author introduce the main characters?</h3>

The characters are very poor people.
The characters have a lot of economic problems.
The characters have few resources.
The characters have many difficulties and discomforts.

At the beginning of the story, the author shows how the characters' salary was very low, implying that they had little money and went through many difficulties.

To emphasize this, the author shows how thin they were and how their house was small, cheap, with low-quality materials, and uncomfortable.

This question is about "The Gift of the Magi" and you can find more information about it at the link below:

brainly.com/question/22508671

5 0

1 year ago

PLZ HEL AND HURRY!! ILL GIVE 20 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST!!! JUST PLEASE HURRY!!!! Read this story and then answer the question that

Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

We should help those in need

3 0

2 years ago

In about 100 words, discuss two themes that are shared by both "The Indian Burying Ground" and "The Wild Honeysuckle" and that b

vladimir2022 [97]

AT the very outset of any discussion of the beginnings of American literature we are met by the pertinent query, Is there really an American literature distinct from English? Such a question can be answered only by reminding ourselves what literature is. Here Dean Stanley’s definition is helpful:

“By literature I mean those great works … that rise above professional or commonplace uses, and take possession of the mind of a whole nation or a whole age.” 1

1

With such a definition, for a test it would be absurd to deny that the work of Poe, of Emerson, of Hawthorne, of Lowell, of Whitman, and of other writers of the nineteenth century were contributions to belles-lettres that were distinctively American. Their work unquestionably was the record of the thoughts and feelings of men who are interpreters of American life and who mirror the prevalent tendencies of their time—work that, in Dean Stanley’s phrase, takes possession of the mind of a whole nation. If it be granted that there was, and is, an American, as distinct from an English literature, then its beginnings in the Colonial and Revolutionary periods are of interest and importance. 2

Literature of the Colonial Period (1607–1765)

American literature, in the strictest sense, as comprising only books that are still generally read, is only about one hundred and fifty years old. Including its period of preparation, however, it is more than three hundred years old. The Colonial period extends from 1607, the year of the founding of the Jamestown Colony, to 1765, the year of the Stamp Act, and the first stirring of political revolt. In its beginnings, therefore, it was contemporary with the great accomplishment of the Elizabethan age in England. When Jamestown was settled in 1607, Spenser had been dead only eight years, Shakespeare was doing his greatest work, Raleigh was writing in the Tower his ‘History of the World,’ and Bacon was beginning his ‘Novum Organum.’ The first books written here in America were contemporary with Shakespeare’s plays, the first books printed here were contemporary with Milton’s, and the first authors born here were contemporary with Dryden and Defoe. 3

Though the great books produced in England were read and admired on this side the water, they did not excite much emulation. Not in America were the great books written. Indeed few books of any kind were produced. The records of the voyages and first settlements, the diaries of the colonists, the sermons of the preachers, are all the Colonial period can show. The colonists were too busy making history to record it, too much occupied in turning a savage wilderness into a civilized country to find leisure for the cultivation of the muses. What little writing was done was in no sense American. Our early writers followed, albeit afar off, the British authors they knew both in theme and method. They looked at life through British spectacles, and failed to produce anything distinctively American. 4

The two centres of literary activity were, naturally, Virginia and Eastern Massachusetts. To the former belongs the credit of having made the first contribution to Colonial literature. The first American book was Captain John Smith’s ‘A True Relation of such Occurrences and Accidents of Noate as hath hapned in Virginia since the first planting of that Colony.’ This book was printed in England in 1608, and was followed by the ‘General History of Virginia’ in 1624. The latter, which was both written and printed in England is an expanded narration of the same incidents recorded in the ‘True Relation.’ Neither the ‘True Relation’ nor its sequel have added anything to Smith’s reputation for veracity. Indeed he ranks with Defoe as one of the most picturesque and entertaining liars in all our literary annals. What he attempted, and succeeded admirably in doing, was to furnish a vivid and, therefore, interesting romance of life in Colonial Virginia. He wrote to satisfy the craving for excitement on the part of the gullible British public, ready to credit anything, even the preposterous Pocahontas story, provided it were localized in the land Michael Drayton (in his poem ‘Virginia’) had affirmed to be “Earth’s only paradise.”

3 0

2 years ago