Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
E. separation, self-service, automation, and scheduling.
Explanation:
Increase in productivity in a business aims to increase the efficiency of an individual or process involved in production of useful output.
Strategies for improving productivity includes separation, self-service, automation, and scheduling.
When there is seperation in services available to a customer, they easily identify the most relevant one to them.
Self service gives control of the process to the customer, resulting in greater satisfaction.
Automation reduces the turnaround time of processes and refocuses labour to more complex activities. So production efficiency increases.
Scheduling reduces time wastage by assigning time to complete activities.
Answer:
can u show the case study
Answer:
for minimum cost the intersection point should be calculated i-e
By using calculator
As x can't be negative so x=0.4828
It's the minimum value because as we decrease the operating cost further the capital value will increase so this is the minimum value.
Graphical solution:
Answer:
TVM=34,720*0.075/12 : [1-(1+0.075/12)^-48]
TVM=839.49
Explanation:
An=34,720
t=4 yrs , ---> n=48 (4*12)
j=7.5 %.---> i=0.075/12
m=12
* i=j/m
*n=mt
TVM=An*i : [1-(1+i)^-n]
TVM=34,720*0.075/12 : [1-(1+0.075/12)^-48]
TVM =839.49 (round two decimal)
