Answer: Market allocates goods effectively.
Explanation: Effective market allocation is the economic market interaction discussed in this case study. As there was a storm and the power lines got down it was obvious that the demand for the batteries and flashlights will increase and the stock became insufficient but the market forces came into action leading to increase in supply and restoring demand and supply to equilibrium level .
<em>Cierto
</em>
<em>Solo depende del tipo de teléfono que se utilice para enviar el documento. Creo que hay algunos teléfonos que se configuran más como computadoras que te permiten enviar documentos. Sin embargo, hay muchos teléfonos que no cuentan con esta función y es probable que la mayoría de los teléfonos celulares que usa la gente en la actualidad no realicen esta acción.</em>
<em>Espero que esto te ayude y que tengas un buen día.</em>
<em>-R3TR0 Z3R0</em>
Answer:
cumulative.
Explanation:
Cumulative preferred stock is defined as a type of stock that states that if any dividend payments have been missed the first payment of the owed dividends must be done to cumulative preferred shareholders in first instance
Answer:
A) initial outlay = $150 million
Cash flow year 1 = [($30 - $25) x 0.6] + $25 = $28
Cash flow year 2 = [($30 - $25) x 0.6] + $25 = $28
Cash flow year 3 = [($30 - $25) x 0.6] + $25 = $28
Cash flow year 4 = [($30 - $25) x 0.6] + $25 + ($25 x 60%) + $50 = $93
B) Using a financial calculator, NPV = -$16.85 million
C) cash flow year 4 should increase by $24.667 million, meaning that the selling price must increase by $$24.667/0.6 = $41.11 million
minimum selling price $25 + $41.11 = $66.11 million
Answer:
b. could be low because people might adjust their expectations quickly if they found anti-inflation policy credible
Explanation:
In the given situation, it is mentioned that the rational expectations proponets said that the sacrified ratio would be lesser as the people wants to adjust their expectations in a fastest way in the case when they found that the anti-inflation policy is credible
Therefore as per the given situation, the option b is correct
