Answer: It is a woman's team.
Technically, it's impossible to score 73 points in a game of basketball by just scoring one single point by each member of the team .
In basketball, there are 5 players in a team on the pitch at a time, plus 7 substitutes making a total of 12 players. The maximum number of points that can be attained by each individual scoring only one point including substitutes is 12 points.
So all things being equal, the team was a women's team and not a single man scored a point because no man was playing the game.
The Triple Alliance, also known as the Central Powers, consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option. The other choices are incorrect and can be neglected. I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.
David is 21 years old and is not kind of work he would like to do after college. like many americans his age, david has not yet developed vocational identity.
Vocational identification is of cost in developing and understanding profession opportunities and aspirations (Ashforth & Fugate, 2001), and is positively associated with profession-related talents, consisting of profession exploration, career decision-making, and self-efficacy (Gushue, Scanlan, Pantzer, & Clarke, 2006), presents a framework.
Due to changes in the world of labor and the bigger society accomplishing an unmarried vocational identity won't be possible or maybe desirable. For maximum rising adults, transitions that end result from planned alternatives boom nicely-being.
Identification success is the existence degree to which a man or woman has subsequently finished a "genuine experience of self." attaining this level calls for self-exploration and an exploration of the alternatives which might be to be had in lifestyles, whether or not which means journeying, operating some of the jobs, or higher education.
Learn more about identity here:
brainly.com/question/26045269
#SPJ4
The type of fallacy that is being described in the scenario
above is the casual fallacy. A casual fallacy is having to use or conclude
ideas in which cause a certain scenario or experience in which is not even
correctly identified.
Viewed by many as Lincoln’s greatest speech, this address declared that slavery was the war’s essential cause and that the war was an expiation of the national sin of slavery. Speaking transcendently to history, President Lincoln explained the Civil War—its cause, its character, and its immediate consequences. Though he wanted to be clear that slavery caused “this mighty scourge of war,” he ended on a hopeful note of binding up the nation’s wounds. His message of “charity for all” diverted some Republican desires for harsh retribution against the South.
