Willow street. It’s right outside my window. I star at it endlessly every single day. I see the happy kids walk past. They joke with each other. I wish I had that. I look across the street at the local park. I see young couples fall in love there. I see dogs run around with each other. Sometimes, I think the outside of my window is just too perfect. Sometimes when I crack my brown dusty window open I can even hear how happy everyone is. I wish I could go there. Be that happy.
hope this helps! Have a good day!
If you are turning this in for something I suggest running it though grammarly because spelling is not my thing.
C.) Both inform the reader that Faryad and Liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station.
In the frames, both Faryad and Liaqat put their fingerprint on a piece of paper when they are at the police station. However, neither of them are given a chance to tell their story. In Faryad's case, "the police write down what they claim has happened". The testimony in the report is not Faryad's. In Liaqat's case, after he put his fingerprint on the paper, he was told to leave and not given any interview.
Option D is incorrect because the reader is not the one responsible for investigating what Faryad and Liaqat were prevented from saying. It does make the reader curious and interested, but the reader can't do the investigation. Option B is wrong because there is no miscommunication. Option A is wrong because there is no proof or even mention of a death in either the frames or the excerpt.
Answer:
b) broad in orientation or scope
Explanation:
The word <em>inclusiveness </em>is derived from the word <em>inclusive </em>and the suffix <em>-ness.</em>
One of the meanings of the word inclusive is: broad in orientation or scope
. That means something that includes or tries to include all items, costs or services.
The suffix <em>-ness</em> is in this case attached to an adjective and it's purpose is to make it a noun, which denote a quality or state.
