A food resource disappears in a pond, and some frogs in a population can eat the remaining food source, while others cannot.
Explanation:
The natural selection among a species occurs when there are some major changes in the environment, most often related to the availability of food sources. In that kind of a situation, some of the individuals will be able to survive and use the remaining food sources, while some not. The ones that will be able to survive will be the stronger and more adapt.
In this scenario, we have a food resources disappearing from the environment of the frogs, so a food shortage occurs. The frogs that are stronger and able to consume the remaining food sources will be the ones that survive, while the weaker ones will be die out. This will result in a natural selection where only the best individuals of the species survive and reproduce in the given circumstances.
Factors that prompt natural selection are:
- changes in the food sources
- climate changes
- major natural hazards
- destruction of the habitat
- increased competition from other species
Learn more about differences between a habitat and a niche brainly.com/question/728057
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
The answer is explained below.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a supreme court case known for establishing the principle of Judicial review in US. Judicial review means that US courts can strike down statutes, laws and other government actions that violate the US constituion. This case is considered to be the one that laid the foundation of US constitutional law. The court's opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.
As per the provision of separation of power the constitution framers wanted the government to have enough powers so that they could run the country but wouldn't be able to abuse it. Thus they developed the provision of separation of power, according to which the power is distributed among the three branches of the the government. So that if one branch of the government tries to abuse their powers others could balance it.
Marbury vs. Madison strengthened this provision as by judicial review the court can control the Congress by declaring laws unconstitutional and illegal.
I believe the answer is C but confirm online! Hope this helped :))
<span>I think nationalism because people were concerned with their importance in the world. They wanted to feel their land and culture were better and more sophisticated than others so they would seek out other areas to validate their feelings.</span>
Explanation:
By contrast, the Radical Enlightenment, starting with John Toland’s Reasons for Naturalizing the Jews in Great Britain and Ireland (1714), tended to view the then-extremely-narrow occupation structure of the Jews, and their focus on petty trade and money-lending, as entirely the fault of the surrounding society, which had long imposed stifling and intolerant restrictions and disabilities on the Jews. For Radical Enlighteners, the narrow, cramped, disfigured character of eighteenth-century Jewish society in Europe was ultimately the responsibility of Christianity and the Christian clergy.
Admittedly, the radicals showed no more sympathy for rabbis, Talmud, traditional Judaism and Jewish community governance than did moderate enlighteners. But their rejection of Christian religious authority, and the existing monarchical-aristocratic form of society, led them to take a much greater interest than moderate enlighteners in emancipating the Jewish people legally, socially and politically, and dismantling all the devices that separated them from the rest of society. This stance attracted more than a few “enlightened” Jews to their ranks.
Consequently, starting with the French Revolution, there arose the phenomenon of the modern revolutionary Jew adopting the principles of this Radical Enlightenment. Figures such as Zalkind Hourwitz, Abrham Furtado, Jacob Pereyre, Junius Frey and Hartog de Hartog Lemon, and later Moses Hess and Heinrich Heine, became notable activists in revolutionary movements that viewed the task of emancipating the Jews and integrating them into democratic republican society, on the basis of full equality, as one of their chief objectives.