Answer:
d. Cost cutting in one area of the value chain might increase costs in another.
Explanation:
Although cost leadership is an efficient way to dominate the competition,it does have potential pitfalls if not executed correctly. For example, if operating cost is decreased, the changed product feature may imply a higher marketing cost afterward. In order to be truly efficient, the cost leadership strategy has to be implemented in such a way, so it doesn't impact other value chain costs negatively (increasing them).
Answer:
C
Explanation:
you don't want to do A or b so with that it can't be D
Answer:
<u>If records invoices at gross amounts</u>
October 2th
inventory 3,000 debit
A/P 3,000 credit
October 2nd
A/P 500 debit
inventory 500 credit
October 17th
inventory 5,400 debit
A/P 5,400 credit
October 26th
A/P 5,400 debit
Inventory 108 credit
cash 5,292 credit
October 31th
A/P 2,500 debit
Cash 2,500 credit
<u>If records invoices at nets amounts</u>
October 2th
inventory 2,940 debit
A/P 2,940 credit
October 2nd
A/P 490 debit
inventory 490 credit
October 17th
inventory 5,292 debit
A/P 5,292 credit
October 26th
A/P 5,292 debit
cash 5,292 credit
October 31th
A/P 2,490 debit
Inventory 10 debit
Cash 2,500 credit
Explanation:
gross amount: we use the invoice nominal
net amount: we use the net nominal
October 2nd net:
3,000 x (1-2%) = 2,940
returns net: 500 x ( 1 - 2%) = 490
October 16th invoice net:
5,400 x ( 1 - 2%) = 5,292
october 31th
october 2th invoice balance:
2,940 - 490 = 2,450
<span>Emily has no case as Toyosan's safety equipment (the airbag) deployed correctly. The safety equipment is there to save lives and reduce serious injury, not eliminate damage completely. Emily would need to sue the driver that caused the accident.</span>
_The time value of money_ principle states that <span>a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future.
Hope this helps</span>