Answer:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-&Q2&Q3\\Sales&327,000&221,000\\Ending&132,600&153,600\\Beginning&196,200&132,600\\Production&263,400&242,000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-%26Q2%26Q3%5C%5CSales%26327%2C000%26221%2C000%5C%5CEnding%26132%2C600%26153%2C600%5C%5CBeginning%26196%2C200%26132%2C600%5C%5CProduction%26263%2C400%26242%2C000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Explanation:
Ending: 60% of nex quearter
q3 221,000 x 60% = 132,600 ending of q2 (therefore beginning of q3
q4 256,000 x 60% = 153,600 ending of q3
begining of q2 is ending of q1 196,200
Production:
sales + desired ending inventory - beginning units
I think the answer would be A. It definitely would not be B or C and D seems kind of rude so I think that A. would be the most courteous and kind. Hope this is helpful for you! :)
Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation of the weighted average contribution margin ratio is shown below:
The Contribution margin ratio is
= (Combined contribution ) ÷ (Sales)
= ($60,000 + $180,000) ÷ ($1,000,000)
= ($240,000) ÷ ($1,000,000)
= 0.24
b. Now the break even point in dollars is
= Fixed cost ÷ contribution margin ratio
= $300,000 ÷ 0.24
= $1,250,000
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
III. The supply of soft drinks decreases
Explanation:
Changes different from price and quantity supplied or quantity demanded will cause changes in the total supply or demand. In this case, an increase in the cost of the aluminum used by soft-drink companies will increase their cost of production. Because this affects companies which supply canned soft drinks, this increase in the cost of production will affect the total supply. If the cost of production increase, with the same resources, they will produce less but need to compensate this decrease in units by increasing the price. In the demand and supply graph, the supply will shift to the left and this will decrease the equilibrium quantity and increase the equilibrium price.
Answer:
They would cause relatively smaller reductions in death from heart disease.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the government incurred $45 million for research on the heart disease and gain that decreased the death occured from the heart disease. Now if the law of diminishing retuns hold, so the extra rise in expenditure on heart disease result in relatively small decline as it decreases the returns
Therefore the same is to be considered
