Financial and investment planning, banking, insurance and business financial management.
Management, customer service, and communication.
The manufacturer of a product that injured consumers, razor sharp electronics, has been found guilty of breaking the criminal liability laws that might have resulted in fines or imprisonment.
<h3>How Does Criminal Liability Work?</h3>
Criminal culpability describes the circumstances under which a person may be held accountable for breaking the law. Criminal liability involves both prospective and actual culpability, which implies that a person may be charged with and punished for either having committed or being suspected of having committed a crime. When it comes to criminal responsibility, the fundamental premise is that the claimed offense has both a mental aspect and a physical element.
To know more about Criminal Liability visit:
brainly.com/question/14567423
#SPJ4
Answer:
This is an example of how an apprenticeship can benefit both the business owner and the apprentice.
Explanation:
Apprenticeship is the system or process of hiring someone to train him/her to learn the trade. This method is used in companies and other jobs to train new generations about the trade and also pass on the job.
David may have had the bicycle shop for three decades but now that he desired more free time, he had to pass on the work to someone who can take care of the shop in his place. The apprenticeship of Josie enabled him to have the desired free time while his shop still runs. This is an example of how apprenticeship is beneficial for both parties.
Answer:
U.S. dollars = 14.012 U.S. dollars
Explanation:
Below is the exchange rate:
0.92777 Canadian dollars = 1 U.S dollars
Thus to find the amount of U.S. dollars bought from the 13 Canadian dollars, just divide the 13 Canadian dollars from 0.92777. Therefore the resulting answer will be the U.S. dollars.
U.S. dollars = 13 / 0.92777
U.S. dollars = 14.012 U.S. dollars
Answer:
B. Employees who agree to obey employers are not truly abandoning their own responsibility.
Explanation:
This statement contradicts the narrow-view because it is telling us that even if employees obey managers in most, of all cases, employees also have their own, authonomous responsabilities, which, by their own will, they try to fulfill, giving them individual agency outside of direct employer control.
