The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.
In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.
A true because it is and plz give me a thank cause i got you the right answer.
Hi. I was only able to find three legal wrongs. Hope this helps. The three legal wrongs are tort, civil, breach of contract. A legal wrong is either a violation of a person's right or the failure to perform a duty. Torts are legal or civil wrong that is committed that causes a loss. Civil is a legal wrong that causes of action under the government law. Breach of contract is a legal wrong when someone does not follow or does not honor the contract.
<span>Some of the factors that prevent China from invading Taiwan are
that it is located in a strategic shipping route. The United States of America can quickly send
a fleet if such an invasion took place.
Taiwan is under the United States of America interest in the
Pacific. This was seen when President
Harry Truman sent a fleet to prevent the Chinese from invading what was left of
Chiang Kai Shek’s forces. Today the U.S.
is still on the alert and even the Chinese would not risk going to war if it
would lead to involving the Americans.</span>
Answer:
how is nepotism tendency a corruption
