D.
The two parts are independent of each other, which dictates the use of a semicolon. "Traffic was heavy." and "We were late."
"Consequently" is a transition between the two, and requires a comma.
<span>1. Levels of hell. Dante describes nine concentric circles, representing an increase of wickedness, where sinners are punished in a fashion befitting their crimes. The Bible says nothing of varying levels of punishment in hell, nor of different levels of severity of sin. The universal punishment for all who reject Jesus Christ as Savior is to be “cast into the lake of fire” (Revelation 20:15). As far as sin is concerned, the Bible declares that failing to keep God’s law in even the smallest aspect makes us guilty of all of it and therefore worthy of eternal punishment (James 2:10). The murderer, the liar and the proud man are all equally guilty in God’s eyes, and all earn the same basic punishment—the lake of fire. </span>
Brainly does not support and will not provide free-response answers. We can only assist you in advice.
Answer:
Some solid sources:
The Case for Universal Healthcare article from AMSA (Pros and cons)
WHO Arguing For UH Coverage article ( very pro UHC) Effective evidence- vast research on several different countries
Economics of Healthcare Harvard article (This source covers how UHC is too expensive, among other pros and cons)
Urban pros and cons of single payer healthcare article(A source with pros and cons)
All pdfs accessible online
Explanation:
These should be good sources of information. Intro and Conclusion are two paragraphs. For the other three, I'd make one discussing pros and cons of UHC regarding cost. How it saves money in the long run vs. how expensive it is initially. Another one about accessibility, how it opens up access to care vs. how it worsens quality of care because of shifted focus. Third paragraph I'd talk about the validity of each resource, how their studies were conducted, how much of their information was objective fact, if evidence could have compounding factors, etc.
Conclude by outlining the pros and cons of each possibility and reiterate the complexity of the debate.
For Questioning of objectivity, you could look at possible bias, look closely at where they cite information and what those studies entail.
I hope this set up helps. :)
here hope it helps!!! ps: if you need to color it just print it out.
