Answer:debt and massive expenses
Explanation:
<h2><em><u>Answer:</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>The answer is B) Marbury V. Madison</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>Explanation:</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>The principle of judicial review was established by Marbury v Madison. Marbury v Madison. , in which district judge William Marbury sued the government to secure his appointment, established the U.S. Supreme Court as the final arbiter on the constitutionality of law. The other cases occurred later in American history.</u></em></h2>
Answer:
The answer is A! "Côte d'Ivoire"!
Explanation:
If you search it up on brainly, I've seen a few others answer it.
If you need more information, here's a link! (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329934/)
It's from the NLM (National Library of Medicine) so it's pretty accurate, just a warning though, it's a very long article.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
1. C
2. C
3. C
4. D
5. A
Not quite sure about the last one, hopefully it helps! :D
Answer:
In the first phase, clearance resulted from agricultural improvement, driven by the need for landlords to increase their income (many landlords had crippling debts, with bankruptcy playing a large part in the history). This involved the enclosure of the open fields managed on the run rig system and the shared grazing. Especially in the North and West of the region, these were usually replaced with large-scale pastoral farms stocked with sheep, on which much higher rents were paid, with the displaced tenants getting alternative tenancies in newly created crofting communities, where they were expected to be employed in industries such as fishing, quarrying or the kelp industry. The reduction in status from farmer to crofter was one of the causes of resentment from these changes.
Explanation:
he eviction of tenants went against dùthchas, the principle that clan members had an inalienable right to rent land in the clan territory. This was never recognised in Scottish law. It was gradually abandoned by clan chiefs as they began to think of themselves simply as commercial landlords, rather than as patriarchs of their people—a process that arguably started with the Statutes of Iona of 1609. The clan members continued to rely on dùthchas. This different viewpoint was an inevitable source of grievance.35–36, 39, 60, 300 The actions of landlords varied. Some did try to delay or limit evictions, often to their financial cost. The Countess of Sutherland genuinely believed her plans were advantageous for those resettled in crofting communities and could not understand why tenants complained. A few landlords displayed complete lack of concern for evicted tenants.
