Answer:no
Step-by-step explanation:
5(3(10)+8)
5(30+8)
5(38)=190
8(10)+8
80+8
88
88≠190 so no
Answer:
Melanie can translate the figure, rotate the figure, or reflect the figure. The figure would still be congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope that helps.... sorry if it doesn't..
Answer:B
Step-by-step explanation: It is wrong bruv
First one A second one C third one d 4th one E
Answer:
Proper, but not simplified
Step-by-step explanation:
Improper fractions have a greater number on the numerator ex:
13/23 45/18