Answer:
Department Y $9000
Department Z $5000
Explanation:
Delivery expense can be calculated using the allocation and apportionment method for Y and Z.
<u>Step 1. Allocation</u>
The costs that are directly attributable to the departments would be allocated to its relevant department. Here, $1500 are the direct expenses for the deliveries for the department Y, so at the first step,
Department Y Cost = $1500
For the department Z, their are no direct expenses for the deliveries,so at the first step,
Department Z Cost = $0
<u>Step 1. Apportionment</u>
The indirect cost of $12500 ($14000 - $1500) would be apportioned among department Y and Z.
So
Department Y = $1500 + $12500 x 60% = $9000
Department Z = $12500 x 40% = $5000
Answer: a. It merely conducted some activity outside of Alaska and that activity took place through a website.
Explanation:
CalmDown can use the defence that all it did was to conduct an activity through it's website and this happened to be outside Alaska.
As such the company is still bound by the state that it is registered in which in this case would seem to be in Alaska. They are not to be bound by the laws of another jurisdiction from the one they are registered to if the activity was done on the internet.
Marcus should therefore try to bring action against them in Alaska if he can.
You have to do A. Address problem with counterplan I just took the unit test I know for sure
Answer:
Vince and Sun-Hi's Book
With Sun-Hi's delivery of the book, the offer by Vince is accepted by Sun-Hi.
Acceptance of an offer is necessary to make a contract.
Explanation:
An offer by Vince is not a contract, but its acceptance by Sun-Hi without a counter-offer makes it a valid contract that can be enforced in law if other ingredients for a valid contract are present. Acceptance establishes the agreement between Vince and Sun-Hi. Once Sun-Hi accepts Vince's offer with valid considerations (the book and double the price), the agreement for a business transaction between them is consummated. It is acceptance that completes the exchange of promises in this simple contract.
Answer:
The correct answer is the letter b. This is a common occurrence. The policymaker usually disregards an economist's advice because they do not believe it is the most efficient policy.
Explanation:
It is common for policymakers to disregard the advice of an economist. This is because in addition to their often finding that the policies suggested by economists are not the most efficient, they observe the political return of such action, ie not just efficiency, but the extent to which this policy will bring political benefits. Thus, as in this case, the policy is not implemented because it is not popular with voters.
