The use of effective contracts with penalties could reduce the following forms of supply chain risks:
- Distribution
- Logistic delays or damages
- Supplier failure to deliver
<h3>
What are supply chain risks?</h3>
Supply chain risk management is "the implementation of strategies to manage routine and non-routine risks in the supply chain to reduce vulnerability and ensure continuity based on ongoing risk assessment".
<h3>
What are effective contracts?</h3>
Most contracts only need to contain two elements to be legally effective: the parties must agree (after one party has made an offer and the other has accepted it).
Something of value, such as money, services or goods (or a promise to exchange such goods) must be exchanged for something else of value.
Learn more about Effective Contracts:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Full Question
The use of effective contracts with penalties could reduce which form of supply chain risk?
A. Distribution
B. Logistic delays or damages
C. Supplier failure to deliver
D. All of the above Question:
Answer:
correct option is a. Innovators
Explanation:
solution
As here VALS some are as
- high resources : Innovators
- ideal : thinker and believer
- achievement : achiever and strivers
- self expression : experiences and maker
- low resources : survivors
sop here Innovator segment is most likely feature in the VALS segment to have a top of the line brand new Surface TM Book
so here correct option is a. Innovators
Answer:
$1,099,203.00
Explanation:
In this question we have to find out the future value that is shown in the attachment below:
Provided that
Present value = $0
Rate of interest = 8% ÷ 2 = 4%
NPER = 25 years × 2 = 50 years
PMT = $1,200 × 6 months = $7,200
The formula is shown below:
= -FV(Rate;NPER;PMT;PV;type)
So, after solving this, the future value is $1,099,203.00
Answer:
C, the board of directors of IFS
Explanation:
The board of the IFS is ultimately responsible for the corporate climate that resulted in the use of substandard ingredients in the meals meant for the troops.
This is because the directors are the ones at the helm of affairs and they decide what happens in the IFS. This means that at least one of the directors is aware of the use of substandard ingredients . It can be said that if one knows, all other know. This phrase convieniently indicts the directors.
Cheers.
First off, the lenders were simply in a position to do so. Secondly, there was an incredible amount of risk involved in loans to pilgrims. Early settlers had numerous obstacles to overcome, such as harsh winters, poor crop yields and the voyage alone to the new world was extremely risky. Dead people cannot pay debts, but those who lived on could. The high risk resulted in high interest rates.
