Answer:
4,513 approx.
Explanation:
The computation of the minimum number of jars of silver polish is shown below:-
Sales revenue for one jar of silver polish $5.60
Sales revenue for 1/4 pound of Grit 337 0.85
($3.40 × 1 ÷ 4)
Incremental revenue from
further processing $4.75
($5.60 - 0.85)
Incremental costs of further processing:
Processing costs $2.40
Selling costs $0.40 $2.80
Incremental contribution
margin from further
processing into silver polish
per jar $1.95
($4.75 - $2.80)
Point of indifference denotes the point where all options are equally profitable. But after that we will see that more processing is profitable. This is due to the fixed costs involved in further production.
Thus Minimum number of jars needed to produce to justify the further processing = Avoidable Fixed cost ÷ Incremental contribution
= $8,800 ÷ $1.95
= 4,513 approx.
Statement that is true of constraints that exist in product mix decisions is Multiple constraints can be handled using linear programming.
<h3>What is Product mix decision?</h3>
Product mix decision refer can be regarded as the decisions involving addition of a new or eliminating any existing product from the product mix.
It involves adding a new product line as well as lengthening any existing line in order to increase the profitability.
Learn about Product mix decision at:
brainly.com/question/14037774
Answer:
Forgery refers to the crime pertaining to, alternation of legal obligation or rights in writing of another person. It is the production of the spurious work which is being considered to be genuine such as a painting, and coin. It is the action underlying imitation or forging a copy of the document, banknote, work of art and signature.
In the case, Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction. The fraud took place due to the recklessness of Debbie Brooks as she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake. She failed to notice the transaction details promptly issued to her periodically by her bank and provided the details of such transaction to the bank within a period of 30 days. The bank is not liable as it has perform its obligation to the fullest. Therefore, it is ascertained that Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction made by Martha Tingstrom.
Explanation:
Answer:
a. Firm M probably has a higher dividend payout ratio than Firm N.
Explanation:
The dividend payout ratio is commonly referred to a portion of the net income of the company which is paid to the various shareholders in dividends. Therefore, if we consider the statements made in the question, Firm M has a higher annual net income while the annual net income of Firm N is fluctuating, we can conclude that the dividend payout ratio of Firm M is more than that of Firm N.
Answer:
$90
Explanation:
The computation of the nominal GDP for the year 4 is shown below:
= Quantity at year 4 × price of year 4
= 18 × $5
= $90
For determining the Nominal GDP for the year 4 we simply multiply the quantity at year 4 with the price of year 4
Hence, the last option is correct