1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shtirlitz [24]
3 years ago
14

Haruka hiked several kilometers in the morning. She only hiked 6 kilometers in the afternoon, which was 25 percent less she had

hiked in the morning. How many kilometers did Haruka hike in all?
Mathematics
2 answers:
Allisa [31]3 years ago
5 0
6km is 3/4 of her morning speed so 6/(3/4)=6×4/3=8km. Total distance=6+8=14km.
nika2105 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

14 kilometers.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the kilometers she hiked on morning,

25% of the hiked kilometers on morning = 25% of x

= 0.25x

Thus, 25% less of the hiked kilometers on morning = x - 0.25x

= 0.75x

According to the question,

0.75x = 6

\implies x=\frac{6}{0.75}=8

Thus, she hiked 8 km in morning,

And, the total kilometers she hiked = hiked kilometers on morning + hiked kilometers on afternoon

= 8 + 6

= 14

You might be interested in
BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

(x + 6, y + 0), 180° rotation, reflection over the x‐axis

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer can be found out simply , a trapezoid has its horizontal sides usually parallel meanwhile the vertical sides are not parallel.

The horizontal parallel sides are on the x-axis.

Reflection over y- axis would leave the trapezoid in a vertical position such that the trapezoid ABCD won't be carried on the transformed trapezoid as shown in figure.

So option 1 and 2 are removed.

Now, a 90 degree rotation would leave the trapezoid in a vertical position again so its not suitable again.

In,The final option (x + 6, y + 0), 180° rotation, reflection over the x‐axis, x+6 would allow the parallel sides to increase in value hence the trapezoid would increase in size,

180 degree rotation would leave the trapezoid in an opposite position and reflection over x-axis would bring it below the Original trapezoid. Hence, transformed trapezoid A`B`C`D` would carry original trapezoid ABCD onto itself

8 0
3 years ago
I have a 6 in the tens place and 7 in the ones place .I am greater than 200 but less than 400. what number am I?​
Alinara [238K]
Either 267 or 367. Is there more info?
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lim n→∞[(n + n² + n³ + .... nⁿ)/(1ⁿ + 2ⁿ + 3ⁿ +....nⁿ)]​
Schach [20]

Step-by-step explanation:

\large\underline{\sf{Solution-}}

Given expression is

\rm :\longmapsto\:\displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty}  \frac{n +  {n}^{2}  +  {n}^{3}  +  -  -  +  {n}^{n} }{ {1}^{n} +  {2}^{n} +  {3}^{n}  +  -  -  +  {n}^{n} }

To, evaluate this limit, let we simplify numerator and denominator individually.

So, Consider Numerator

\rm :\longmapsto\:n +  {n}^{2} +  {n}^{3}  +  -  -  -  +  {n}^{n}

Clearly, if forms a Geometric progression with first term n and common ratio n respectively.

So, using Sum of n terms of GP, we get

\rm \:  =  \: \dfrac{n( {n}^{n}  - 1)}{n - 1}

\rm \:  =  \: \dfrac{ {n}^{n}  - 1}{1 -  \dfrac{1}{n} }

Now, Consider Denominator, we have

\rm :\longmapsto\: {1}^{n} +  {2}^{n} +  {3}^{n}  +  -  -  -  +  {n}^{n}

can be rewritten as

\rm :\longmapsto\: {1}^{n} +  {2}^{n} +  {3}^{n}  +  -  -  -  +  {(n - 1)}^{n} +   {n}^{n}

\rm \:  =  \:  {n}^{n}\bigg[1 +\bigg[{\dfrac{n - 1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} + \bigg[{\dfrac{n - 2}{n}\bigg]}^{n} +  -  -  -  + \bigg[{\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} \bigg]

\rm \:  =  \:  {n}^{n}\bigg[1 +\bigg[1 - {\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} + \bigg[1 - {\dfrac{2}{n}\bigg]}^{n} +  -  -  -  + \bigg[{\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} \bigg]

Now, Consider

\rm :\longmapsto\:\displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty}  \frac{n +  {n}^{2}  +  {n}^{3}  +  -  -  +  {n}^{n} }{ {1}^{n} +  {2}^{n} +  {3}^{n}  +  -  -  +  {n}^{n} }

So, on substituting the values evaluated above, we get

\rm \:  =  \: \displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty}  \frac{\dfrac{ {n}^{n}  - 1}{1 -  \dfrac{1}{n} }}{{n}^{n}\bigg[1 +\bigg[1 - {\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} + \bigg[1 - {\dfrac{2}{n}\bigg]}^{n} +  -  -  -  + \bigg[{\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} \bigg]}

\rm \:  =  \: \displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty}  \frac{ {n}^{n}  - 1}{{n}^{n}\bigg[1 +\bigg[1 - {\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} + \bigg[1 - {\dfrac{2}{n}\bigg]}^{n} +  -  -  -  + \bigg[{\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} \bigg]}

\rm \:  =  \: \displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty}  \frac{ {n}^{n}\bigg[1 - \dfrac{1}{ {n}^{n} } \bigg]}{{n}^{n}\bigg[1 +\bigg[1 - {\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} + \bigg[1 - {\dfrac{2}{n}\bigg]}^{n} +  -  -  -  + \bigg[{\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} \bigg]}

\rm \:  =  \: \displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty}  \frac{\bigg[1 - \dfrac{1}{ {n}^{n} } \bigg]}{\bigg[1 +\bigg[1 - {\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} + \bigg[1 - {\dfrac{2}{n}\bigg]}^{n} +  -  -  -  + \bigg[{\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} \bigg]}

\rm \:  =  \: \displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty}  \frac{1}{\bigg[1 +\bigg[1 - {\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} + \bigg[1 - {\dfrac{2}{n}\bigg]}^{n} +  -  -  -  + \bigg[{\dfrac{1}{n}\bigg]}^{n} \bigg]}

Now, we know that,

\red{\rm :\longmapsto\:\boxed{\tt{ \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \infty} \bigg[1 + \dfrac{k}{x} \bigg]^{x}  =  {e}^{k}}}}

So, using this, we get

\rm \:  =  \: \dfrac{1}{1 +  {e}^{ - 1}  + {e}^{ - 2} +  -  -  -  -  \infty }

Now, in denominator, its an infinite GP series with common ratio 1/e ( < 1 ) and first term 1, so using sum to infinite GP series, we have

\rm \:  =  \: \dfrac{1}{\dfrac{1}{1 - \dfrac{1}{e} } }

\rm \:  =  \: \dfrac{1}{\dfrac{1}{ \dfrac{e - 1}{e} } }

\rm \:  =  \: \dfrac{1}{\dfrac{e}{e - 1} }

\rm \:  =  \: \dfrac{e - 1}{e}

\rm \:  =  \: 1 - \dfrac{1}{e}

Hence,

\boxed{\tt{ \displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty}  \frac{n +  {n}^{2}  +  {n}^{3}  +  -  -  +  {n}^{n} }{ {1}^{n} +  {2}^{n} +  {3}^{n}  +  -  -  +  {n}^{n} } =  \frac{e - 1}{e} = 1 -  \frac{1}{e}}}

3 0
2 years ago
The slope of the line below is -2. Which of the following is the point-slope form of the line?
madreJ [45]

Answer: the answer should be D

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Tomas wrote the equation y = 3x +y equals 3 x plus StartFraction 3 over 4 EndFraction.. When Sandra wrote her equation, they dis
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

-6x+2y=\frac{3}{2}

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation Thomas wrote is:

y=3x+\frac{3}{4} ...equation 1

Let us subtract 3x from both sides to get:

-3x+y=\frac{3}{4}

We now multiply through by 2 to get:

-6x+2y=\frac{3}{2} ....equation 2

We can see that equation one and two are equivalent and hence have the same solution.

Therefore Sandra's equation is -6x+2y=\frac{3}{2}

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • describe how you can move shape 1 to exactly match shape 2 buy using one translation and one reflection
    13·1 answer
  • 13x + 7 (-3x -1) = 63
    14·2 answers
  • I really need help. Please answer as many as you can. I'm still figuring some out. Thanks!
    14·1 answer
  • Which expression are equivalent to 2x+4
    10·1 answer
  • I need help really bad I'm gonna give 25 points who helps me
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose 300 randomly selected people are surveyed to determine whether or not they rent their home. Of the 300 surveyed, 60 repo
    6·2 answers
  • What is the value of x? Enter your answer in the box. °
    7·1 answer
  • Write an inequality for the statement. The sum of a number and nine is less than thirty.
    9·1 answer
  • State a,b, and the y-intercept then graph the function on a graphing calculator<br>​
    14·2 answers
  • The first triangle is dilated to form the second triangle. What id the scale factor?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!