The court would rule in sue's favor because courts seldom inquire into the adequacy of consideration.
In contracts, <em>consideration </em>just means the <em>exchange of things of value</em>. There has to be an exchange of things of value for there to be an enforceable contract, and in this case a watch was exchanged for money. It is rare for courts to rule on how much consideration is expected because people are generally free to set their own prices and not sell if the price is too low. That is not for a court to decide (in most cases).
Decoy pricing tactic calls for offering three similar products, one that is lower priced and less attractive and two that are comparable but more expensive.
<h3><u>
</u></h3><h3><u>
What is decoy pricing?</u></h3>
A price strategy called decoy pricing aims to "push" customers to make a decision. Customers sometimes have to choose between products with varying costs and features while making purchases. And when a business seeks to increase sales of a certain product, it frequently chooses what is known as a decoy pricing structure to sway the consumer's choice. In this instance, the "decoy" is either a product with a slightly cheaper price but much worse quality, or a product with a significantly higher price but slightly greater quality.
The attraction effect and the compromise effect are the two distinct effects on which the decoy pricing strategy is predicated.
<u></u>
Learn more about pricing tactics with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/25716956?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. The policy made decisions for other departments in the company.
Explanation:
John Smith made the policy alone without involving the other managers. When the policy was implemented, it had to work with other departments to ensure success.
As there are 3 managers and 3 departments at BSG Labs, John Smith should have formulated the new policy with the other managers, so that issues such as scheduling and coordination between bthe various departments will run smoothly.
Answer:
6.1 y
Explanation:
Diamond Company
New equipment÷(Annual net income +Depreciation expense)
New equipment$1,400,000
Annual net income $90,000
Depreciation expense $140,000
$1,400,000 ÷ ($90,000 + $140,000)
=$1,400,000÷$230,000
= 6.1 y
Therefore the cash payback period will be 6.1 years
