1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vazorg [7]
3 years ago
14

During the Reconstruction, Radical Republicans accused President Johnson of taking it too easy on the South. Johnson pardoned ma

ny Confederate leaders in exchange for an oath of loyalty. Radical Republicans insisted on further punishments for Confederate leaders and more drastic, government-assured rights for former slaves in the South. What could be Johnson’s reasoning for not further punishing Confederate leaders? What arguments could be made for supporting the Radical Republican view of adding further punishment?
History
2 answers:
SpyIntel [72]3 years ago
8 0

1.

Perhaps he felt that the healing and reunification process was more important than revenge.

Harsh punishment might make the reconstruction process more difficult if people in power resisted in the South.

2.

The Confederates were traitors that took up armed rebellion against the lawful government of the United States. Harsh punishment might serve as an example to future possible rebels.

If not forced to do so, Southern leaders would never grant equal rights to former slaves.

iVinArrow [24]3 years ago
3 0

In 1865 President Andrew Johnson actualized an arrangement of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free submit managing the change from subjection to opportunity and offered no job to blacks in the governmental issues of the South. The lead of the administrations he set up turned numerous Northerners against the president's arrangements. The end of the Civil War found the country without a settled Reconstruction approach. In May 1865, President Andrew Johnson offered an exculpate to every single white Southerner aside from Confederate pioneers and rich grower (albeit the greater part of these later gotten individual acquits), and approved them to make new governments.

Black people were denied any job all the while. Johnson additionally requested almost all the land in the hands of the administration came back to its prewar proprietors - dashing dark seeks after monetary self-sufficiency. At the start, most Northerners trusted Johnson's arrangement merited an opportunity to succeed. The course pursued by Southern state governments under Presidential Reconstruction, in any case, turned a large portion of the North against Johnson's strategy. Individuals from the old Southern first class, including numerous who had served in the Confederate government and armed force, came back to control. The new assemblies passed the Black Codes, extremely restricting the previous slaves' lawful rights and monetary choices in order to compel them to come back to the estates as needy workers. A few states constrained the occupations open to blacks. None enabled any blacks to cast a ballot or gave open assets to their instruction.

Johnson reasoning is exposed before as how important the new laws were to white leaders, and most radicals were against this. The main supporting argument is that Radicals of Lincoln's GOP wished severe reconstruction. They aforesaid the South was a defeated enemy. They demanded sturdy social control for all southerners WHO took half within the rebellion. These radicals had disliked Lincoln's plans for reconstruction. They felt he was too weak. Now, they hoped Johnson would share their concepts. They urged him to decide a session of Congress to pass robust legislation against the South. The radicals had reason to believe the new president united with them. He had known as the rebels traitors. He had demanded sturdy action against them once the war terminated.

Yet, Andrew Johnson shocked the radicals. He didn't call the exceptional session of Congress. Rather, he declared his own program for the southern states. Johnson pronounced an exculpate for every single previous confederate who guaranteed to help the Union and obey laws against bondage. At that point, he allowed previous authorities of the alliance to keep running for office in their states' new races. A considerable lot of these previous revolutionaries were chosen.  

The radicals additionally stressed over what might happen to as of late liberated slaves. They said the new state administrations of the South would not regard blacks as free and equivalent nationals. As confirmation, they indicated new laws the southern assemblies passed. The extreme Republicans chose that President Johnson's recreation program must be halted. They started attempting to gain the power of Congress to pass their own program. Just by increasing political power would they be able to rebuff the South and assurance full political rights to previous slaves. So that, the radicals endeavored to take control in two different ways. To start with, they declined to let a large number of them as of late chosen southern congressmen sit down when Congress opened. At that point, they framed their very own joint board of trustees on reproduction. This panel - not the Senate or the House of Representatives - would settle on a significant number of the choices about recreation.

You might be interested in
Who had one term in office and caused a split the republican party
Alexandra [31]
Theodore Roosevelt's attempt to run again in 1912 caused a split in the Republican Party. 
6 0
3 years ago
How effective were unions in shaping political and economic policies?
Darina [25.2K]

Unions were very effective in shaping political and economic policies. Even though their initial efforts did not have success in the late 19th century, their 20th century efforts changed America forever.

For example, the labor unions were able to get the government to pass laws regarding the 8 hour work day, the outlawing of child labor for kids under the age of 16, and the implementation of health and safety regulations to ensure that factory workers were in suitable conditions. Along with this, there are now federal agencies that to this day, continue to monitor businesses and their activities to ensure that they are not breaking any labor laws or health and safety regulations.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was world war ll in a global war? what countries outside of europe participated in this war? which slide did they support? w
Stels [109]

Answer:

The reason why WWII was a global war was because the whole war was surrounded and centered with big powers such as Great Britain, Germany, Russia, France, Italy, Japan, and the United States.

The countries outside of Europe that participated in this war was Germany, Russia, Japan, and the United States.

Europe supported the allied forces. ( Soviet Union, United States, France, Great Britain.)

Their contribution to their side of the campaign was being an helping hand to both United States and the Soviet Union and plus they also aided the soldiers.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The cold war space race was between-?
disa [49]
They were BOTH between The U.S.A. and Russia ;-)
I hope I helped! =D
6 0
3 years ago
to what extent were relations between the united states and great britain more positive in the era of good feelings than they we
Masteriza [31]

In the 1780's and 1790's The United States and Britain had just fought in a war against each other. The United States and Britain went to war over the American people wanting freedom from British rule and taxation. The Americas won the war leading to large American debt and strained relations with Great Britain who embargoed American made goods.

The Era of Good Feelings, which occurred from about 1815 until about 1825, was a time period in which nationalism (or extreme pride in one's country) were at a high after America won the War of 1812. After the War of 1812, many British citizen wanted to reopen trade between Great Britain and America. There were no territorial losses between either countries and both sides were open to becoming close allies. This was made possible after the Treaty of Ghent, Rush-Bagot Treaty, The Treaty of 1818, The Webster-Ashburton Treaty, The return of Massachusetts, and the Oregon Treaty. These agreements documented the positive energy and the willingness to compromise and remain allies of both major nations.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Match each description to Either the Silk Road or the Maritime Routes to Asia.
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the conquistadors want to defeat the Aztecs and incans
    15·1 answer
  • Name a African american that is important
    11·2 answers
  • Help me please I don’t now what is the answer please
    11·1 answer
  • Which laws directed the flow of goods between England and the colonies
    8·1 answer
  • How did the tactics of the Civil Rights movement differ from those of the women's rights movement?
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think equality between the racist would have come to America without the civil rights movement?
    14·2 answers
  • What did England and France competed for the River Valley early on in the conflict.
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement is accurate about the Parthenon? A. It was dedicated to the god, Zeus. B. It was used as a theatre. C. It was us
    14·1 answer
  • How were german aircraft dectected by britian? What did it cause hitler to do
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!