1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vazorg [7]
4 years ago
14

During the Reconstruction, Radical Republicans accused President Johnson of taking it too easy on the South. Johnson pardoned ma

ny Confederate leaders in exchange for an oath of loyalty. Radical Republicans insisted on further punishments for Confederate leaders and more drastic, government-assured rights for former slaves in the South. What could be Johnson’s reasoning for not further punishing Confederate leaders? What arguments could be made for supporting the Radical Republican view of adding further punishment?
History
2 answers:
SpyIntel [72]4 years ago
8 0

1.

Perhaps he felt that the healing and reunification process was more important than revenge.

Harsh punishment might make the reconstruction process more difficult if people in power resisted in the South.

2.

The Confederates were traitors that took up armed rebellion against the lawful government of the United States. Harsh punishment might serve as an example to future possible rebels.

If not forced to do so, Southern leaders would never grant equal rights to former slaves.

iVinArrow [24]4 years ago
3 0

In 1865 President Andrew Johnson actualized an arrangement of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free submit managing the change from subjection to opportunity and offered no job to blacks in the governmental issues of the South. The lead of the administrations he set up turned numerous Northerners against the president's arrangements. The end of the Civil War found the country without a settled Reconstruction approach. In May 1865, President Andrew Johnson offered an exculpate to every single white Southerner aside from Confederate pioneers and rich grower (albeit the greater part of these later gotten individual acquits), and approved them to make new governments.

Black people were denied any job all the while. Johnson additionally requested almost all the land in the hands of the administration came back to its prewar proprietors - dashing dark seeks after monetary self-sufficiency. At the start, most Northerners trusted Johnson's arrangement merited an opportunity to succeed. The course pursued by Southern state governments under Presidential Reconstruction, in any case, turned a large portion of the North against Johnson's strategy. Individuals from the old Southern first class, including numerous who had served in the Confederate government and armed force, came back to control. The new assemblies passed the Black Codes, extremely restricting the previous slaves' lawful rights and monetary choices in order to compel them to come back to the estates as needy workers. A few states constrained the occupations open to blacks. None enabled any blacks to cast a ballot or gave open assets to their instruction.

Johnson reasoning is exposed before as how important the new laws were to white leaders, and most radicals were against this. The main supporting argument is that Radicals of Lincoln's GOP wished severe reconstruction. They aforesaid the South was a defeated enemy. They demanded sturdy social control for all southerners WHO took half within the rebellion. These radicals had disliked Lincoln's plans for reconstruction. They felt he was too weak. Now, they hoped Johnson would share their concepts. They urged him to decide a session of Congress to pass robust legislation against the South. The radicals had reason to believe the new president united with them. He had known as the rebels traitors. He had demanded sturdy action against them once the war terminated.

Yet, Andrew Johnson shocked the radicals. He didn't call the exceptional session of Congress. Rather, he declared his own program for the southern states. Johnson pronounced an exculpate for every single previous confederate who guaranteed to help the Union and obey laws against bondage. At that point, he allowed previous authorities of the alliance to keep running for office in their states' new races. A considerable lot of these previous revolutionaries were chosen.  

The radicals additionally stressed over what might happen to as of late liberated slaves. They said the new state administrations of the South would not regard blacks as free and equivalent nationals. As confirmation, they indicated new laws the southern assemblies passed. The extreme Republicans chose that President Johnson's recreation program must be halted. They started attempting to gain the power of Congress to pass their own program. Just by increasing political power would they be able to rebuff the South and assurance full political rights to previous slaves. So that, the radicals endeavored to take control in two different ways. To start with, they declined to let a large number of them as of late chosen southern congressmen sit down when Congress opened. At that point, they framed their very own joint board of trustees on reproduction. This panel - not the Senate or the House of Representatives - would settle on a significant number of the choices about recreation.

You might be interested in
Which is an accurate statement about the fall of the Roman Empire and its effect on culture and civilization in Western Europe?
Fofino [41]
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice "The Goths established a new, centralized government that controlled all Roman territory."

The Sack of Rome occurred on August 24, 410. The city was attacked by theVisigoths<span> led by </span>King Alaric<span>. At that time, Rome was no longer the capital of the Western Roman Empire, having been replaced in that position by Ravenna in 402.</span>

I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were so many americans anxious about the economic future of the nation at the conclusion of world war ii? why did these fear
ohaa [14]
Perhaps it's all about the destruction that the nation had to face after the war. It did not take long before America recovered from this phase. <span>The transition of some industries to military armament manufacture caught the economy from total lost.</span><span>
</span><span>
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
The goal of the D-Day invasion (Operation Overlord) at Normandy, France, was which of the following? A. To defeat the Axis Power
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

D. To take back the city of Stalingrad from Germany.​

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was the name of the treaty that ended the (i think) world war I? A) Treaty of Paris B) Treaty of Versailles C) Philadelphia
elixir [45]

<em>Answer:</em>

<em>Treaty of Versailles</em>

<em>Explanation:</em>

<em>Treaty of Versailles was the official document that officially ended the first World War. It was signed between Germany and the Allied Powers on June 28, 1919, in the hall of mirrors of the Palace of Versailles. According to this treaty, Germany was guilt of the damage and human losses during the war. Germany, as a determined aggressor in the war, was obliged to pay reparations for war damage. Hope this helps! Have a blessed day!</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following events could have occurred as a human survival strategy during the last ice age ?
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Earliest humans to live in Europe were able to survive the last Ice Age period that was a characterized by ferocious change in the climate that covered the continent in a thick layer of ice. Stone age blacksmiths during this period survived through the masterly and use of fire to make tools as a survival strategy while old cultures died and new ones emerged over thousands of years, where the hunter-gatherer populations ebbed and flowed. The hunting of animals and gathering of wild fruit and berries eventually led to adoption of pastoral, farming cultures that arrived in Europe from the Middle East around 8,000 years ago.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • During the depression forclosed rates skyrockted? what was the main<br> cause?
    14·1 answer
  • L 2.3.5 Quiz: Social Changes
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following issues is not one of the reasons why many Pacific Island countries kept ties with their colonizing countr
    5·2 answers
  • How did territorial expansion help the united states to grow economically
    5·1 answer
  • summarize the immigration situation president trump and the migrants caravan what are the facts and why has this turned into a m
    12·1 answer
  • Karl marx believed that religion question 5 options:
    6·1 answer
  • 01. How did railroads most affect the economic growth of the United States?​
    6·2 answers
  • "Each representative who wishes to speak on the bill will be allowed five minutes." A statement like this one would be the work
    6·1 answer
  • What events caused the declaration of Independence? what effect did the declaration of Independence have on the future of Americ
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following objectives proved to be the hardest and took the longest to accomplish?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!