Answer:
Explanation:
The person you want I think is Ten Bears (otherwise known as Perry - wah - say - men). He refused to move because the land offered was too small to suit the life style of those that were to live there.
I can't help but add that this is another sorry part of the history of the Indians and their white conquerors. The wars lasted about 400 years and those that were involved in the Treaty of Medicine Lodge Creek were not uniquely dishonest, but they were not given to honor the treaties.
Their behavior coupled with congress later on up to the middle of the twentieth century cost the American Government 10s of Millions of dollars and that's when the American Dollar meant something.
Even the Supreme Court was involved in ill treatment of the Indians. The first case was Lone Wolf vs Hitchcock in 1903. I point this out because the Court ruled against the tribes claiming that the American Government had Plenary Rights. The term plenary means that they had absolute rights: they did not have to negotiate.
Many people note that if the government had negotiated fairly and honestly many lives would have been saved to say nothing of the money that was eventually paid out.
Don't let your studies stop at just knowing the answer to the question you asked. Find out the full answer.
The second began to decline by 1870 membership rose rapidly among Baptist and Methodist conversations it enrolled millions of new members and led to the formation of new documentations
Answer:
<em>Hello, The answer is C. U.S. Supreme Court justices are appointed while Georgia Supreme Court justices are elected.</em>
Explanation:
A major difference between the Georgia Constitution and the U.S. Constitution is that U.S. Supreme Court justices are appointed while Georgia Supreme Court justices are elected. U.S. justices are appointed by the president while Georgia justices are elected by citizens of the state.
After removing all political opposition through his secret police and outlawing labor strikes, Mussolini and his followers consolidated their power through a series of laws that transformed the nation into a one-party dictatorship.
The correct answer is The Latin economy was growing considerably in 1900, but they were still very dependent on other non-Latin countries.
Between 1950 and 1980, Latin America experienced rapid growth. During this period, the product expanded at an annual rate of 5.8% with per capita increases of 3% per year on average. Table 1 provides details. The best performance is clearly that of Brazil, whose participation regional product increase from less than a quarter to more than than a third. At the other extreme are two groups. One is the Southern Cone (Argentina, Chile and Uruguay) whose position as leader in the region in 1950 was worn. The other stragglers include a variety of smaller countries, some in Central America. Latin America's average performance after World War II is impressive when compared to the following facts. The goal of Alliance for Progress, implemented in 1961, was an annual growth rate of 2% in per capita terms. The growth of per capita income capita in Europe as a result of the Industrial Revolution was 1.3% from 1850 to 1900 and 1.4% between 1900 and 1950. The economic growth of the long term in the United States was 1.8% per year. However, two factors contributed to overshadow the performance of the Latin America between 1950 and 1980. One is the dramatic reversal of this performance in the 1980s. Latin America has gone back in this decade, with the product falling at the rate of 1.4%, as recorded in table 1. Until 1988, with the exception of Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Dominican Republic, the pm per capita of all countries in the region had fallen below the level 1980. Venezuela, Nicaragua and EI Salvador showed levels below those achieved in 1960. The 1980s were truly a lost decade. Consequently, previous progress is underestimated.