The correct answer is <span>the amendment receives a two-thirds vote.
The amendment process is difficult because of this since everyone has to agree on it and it doesn't happen often that 2/3 of both houses agree on anything. The two-thirds numbers is called the supermajority.</span>
Answer: A. The statute burdens foreign commerce
Explanation:
The options are:
A. The statute burdens foreign commerce.
B. The statute violates equal protection guarantees because it is not rational to prohibit the sale of foreign beef but not foreign leather.
C. The statute substantially interferes with the vendor's right to earn a living under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
D. The statute constitutes a taking without due process of law.
From the question, we are informed that a cattle-producing state adopted a statute that requires any food service business operating in the state to serve beef raised in the United States and that a licensed hot dog vendor who worked at a football field within the state and who had been buying hot dogs made with foreign beef for the past several years calculated that switching to an all-beef hot dog made from United States beef would reduce his profits by 10%.
The vendor then hired an attorney to challenge the statute and the attorney discovered during research into the case that most of the footballs used at the football field at which the vendor worked were made of foreign leather.
Based on the above scenario, it should be noted that it is the Congress that has power to regulate foreign commerce. Hence, in this scenario, the state adopting a legislation that requires the private vendors to favor the breed served in the United States over the foreign products is outside its powers scope. Only the congress can make such decision.
I believe it would be black code laws, hoped this helped you.
I'll start with the second question - it's definitely Yugoslavia. Right now there is a talk about what Hilary Clinton did in Bosnia - it was during this time- this is just one way in which you can remember this. I was mostly the ethnic clensing of Bosnians by the Serbians.
Now, the first question. Let's look at the options:
A. Too much regulation would attract illegal immigrants.
-no, there is no reason why it would attract immigrants
B. Environmental laws didn't work lo clean the environment.
-that's not true- they most often do
C. Too much regulation would clean the water.
yes, but that's a good thing!
D. Too much regulation could hurt businesses
-this is the correct answer. It's an actual criticism that is often found.
Ratio:
3 boys / 5 girls
total = 8 people
5 girls / 8 people
Proportion:
5 girls / 8 people = x girls / 40 people
8x = 200
x = 25 girls
40 - 25 = 15 boys
25 - 15 = 10 more girls than boys
There are 10 more girls than boys in the class.
Hope this helps!! :)
