C. balance sheets
explanation:
Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so.
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog.
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4
<span> Yes, Tyler has a claim against food world because he</span> has a cause of action against Food World for wrongful discharge. The reason is because his refusal to take the polygraph test cannot be the basis for termination of his employment . More evidence about the claim that he took the cigarettes is required for a claim.
Answer:
Cross Sectional Quasi-Experiment
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the type of design that Bart is using in this scenario is a Cross Sectional Quasi-Experiment. This is a type of experiment in which two or more different types of groups are compared at the same time in order to analyze the results and come to a conclusion of the experimental variable that is being researched. Which in this case would be "who has better reaction time.".
I believe the answer is C. Hope this helped!
