Answer:
0.60
Explanation:
The midpoint formula is used to calculate elasticity by using average percentage in both price and quantity.
The formula is given below:
Percentage change in quantity =<u> (Q2 -Q1) </u> x 100
(Q2 + Q1) / 2
Percentage change in price = <u> (P2 -P1) </u> x 100
(P2 + P1) / 2
Elasticity =<u> Percentage change in price__</u>
Percentage change in quantity
Inserting the data:
Percentage change in quantity =<u> (30 -20) </u> x 100 = <u>10</u> x 100 = 40%
(30 + 20) /2 25
Percentage change in price = <u>($20 - $10)</u> x 100 = <u>10</u> x 100 = 66.6%
($20 + $10) /2 15
Elasticity of supply = <u>40%</u>
66.6%
= 0.60
The accrual-based income statement superior to a cash-based income statements in measuring profitability because It reports the expenses incurred in generating the revenues regardless of when the cash was paid.
What distinguishes the accrual basis of accounting from the cash basis of accounting?
When money is received or spent, it is recorded as revenue using the cash foundation of accounting. When using the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recorded as they are earned and expenses as they are incurred.
What is an income statement with an accrual basis?
Accounting on an accrual system records revenue and corresponding costs as they are incurred, rather than when money is exchanged. Accordingly, businesses report revenue when it is earned rather than when it is received.
To know more about Income Statement Visit
<u>brainly.com/question/14326095</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
It is the Cost of Goods Manufactured that should be transferred to the Finished Goods account. As both of them are asset account, adding to the Finished Goods account would debit it and taking from the Work in Process account would credit it.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
XX-XX-XXX Finished Goods $1,469,000
Work in Process $1,469,000
Answer:
Misappropriation refers to the use of another person's intellectual property including their name or likeness without prior permission from the person which can then cause harm to that person.
This is indeed an example of misappropriation because the company tried to use Bette's likeness in the commercial. After being rebuffed by Bette saying that she does not do commercials for whatever business or personal reasons known to her, they still sought to use her popularity and image to make their products more popular.
To do so they hired a backup singer and told her to sing as much like Bette as she could so much so that even Bette's close acquaintances thought that it was Bette. If her close acquaintances could think it was her, imagine the general public.
They therefore made it seem as though Bette did their commercial which then would mean that Bette does in fact do commercials which would do damage her assertion that she does not do same. This would bring harm to her business relationships if for instance she had rebuffed other companies in the past when they sought her to do their commercials.
This is a case of Misappropriation and Bette should sue.
