Answer:
awwwee ill helppp youuu with yourr workkkkk :))))))
Explanation:
The demand quantity will increase due to more of them being bought.
The question surrounding the Nullification Crisis of 1832 was whether or not the state governments had the ability to void federal laws that they saw as unconstitutional.
This idea of nullification was a result of the federal government passing several different tariffs in 1828. These tariffs increased the price of foreign goods and resulted in other countries being less likely to trade with America. These tariffs had a negative effect on Southern states especially, hence why they argued that they could nullify laws they saw as unconstitutional. Ultimately, this idea has never been solidified or supported by any US courts.
Answer:
The answer is: Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.
Explanation:
Chief Joseph was the leader of an indigenous group of people called <em>"Wal-lam-wat-kain," </em>a Native American tribe.
Commissioner Ely S. Parker was a lieutenant of the American Civil War. He became the Commissioner of Indian Affairs which meant that he was responsible for managing the lands that was entrusted by the USA to the <em>Indian tribes, Alaska Natives and American Indians.</em>
The difference between Chief Joseph's and Commissioner Parker's arguments was that <u>the Chief believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty,</u> while <u>Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.</u>
For Parker, none of the tribes could guarantee them of a governance whereby people would obey the law. For him, it was a great deal of harm that the government of the USA allowed the Indians to believe that they were sovereign or independent nation. Because of this, Chief Joseph resisted the Americans when they negotiated with them to relocate to a reservation.
