All categories

3 years ago

How did the role of government change during the 1930s?

2 answers:

7 0

The Great Depression was the major factor that forced the government to change its role after 1929.

Further Explanation:

Stock market crash in 1929 was the landmark that marked the start of several issues like unemployment, deflation, poverty, high consumer debt. The industries which suffered most were shipping, mining, agriculture. The Automobiles were very hard hit. The Great Depression has a major impact on political administration of the country. It caused many political changes.

The programs like relief and recovery were instituted. The Government used stimuluspackages, social security and Keynesian economics were used. Banks were given orders to liquidate the money, this increase the money supply in themarket. This contracted the economy that results in a decline un investment. Then the US government engaged in expansionary monetary policies.

Interest rates were raised that attracted international investors. These investors bought foreign assets. US increased the gold standard. They adopted a tight monetary policy.

All the steps were taken by Franklin Roosevelt. Then with all these reforms employment increased, the banking system improved and the USA became the superpower again in the multipolar world.

Learn more:

1. The house and senate can only pass amendments to the constitution if? brainly.com/question/10867824

2. Goods that are considered to be needs tend to be? brainly.com/question/983965

3. Which best explains how contractionary policies can hamper economic growth? brainly.com/question/468188

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Political Science

Keywords: Stock market Crash, Stimulus packages, Social security, Keynesian economics, liquidate money, expansionary monetary policies, international investors, tight monetary policy.

Mrac [35]3 years ago

4 0

The major effect of the Great Depression and the New Deal on America was expanded government intervention into new areas of social and economic affairs and the creation of more social assistance agencies at the national level.

You might be interested in

Marjoe had trained his dog that whenever it saw a photo of the cat next door, it would receive a treat. Through multiple pairing

Digiron [165]

Answer:

a) spontaneous recovery

Explanation:

In classical conditioning, the term spontaneous recovery is defined as the reappearance of the conditioned response after a rest period or period of lessened response. In other words, the conditioned response is back after it was thought to have disappeared.

In this example, Marjoe trained his dog that whenever it saw a photo of the cat next door, he'd receive a treat. The dog was conditioned to start salivating (conditioned response) whenever he saw the photo of the cat (conditioned stimulus). Then Marjoe extinguished the conditioned response by presenting the photo without the treat. However, a week later, when he hold up the photo of the cat, the dog started to salivate.

That is, he came up with the conditioned response after a rest period, so he presented the response when Marjoe thought it had disappeared.

Thus, this is an example of spontaneous recovery.

Note:

b) Stimulus discrimination refers to the capacity to recognize one specific stimulus among others.

c) Stimulus generalization refers to the fact that the response appears with similar stimulus but not with only one (the dog would salivate with any picture of cats)

8 0

3 years ago

According to John Locke, what is the MAIN why a government should exist?

pav-90 [236]

The correct answer is letter C

Locke initially advocated the need for a centralized government structure that would prevent disorder within society. His conservative and authoritarian vision also extended to the field of religiosity, at a time when he believed that the monarch should interfere in the religious options of his subjects. However, his interest in the field of philosophy gradually changed his views.

One of the fundamental points of his political thought changed considerably when the intellectual began to question the legitimacy of the divine right of kings. The work that essentially deals with this subject is entitled “Two Treaties on Government” and was published in the late 17th century. In his views, Locke advocated the establishment of political practices that were not against the natural laws of the world.

In addition, this prominent thinker observed many of his interests in the political field being themed within his country when he witnessed important events regarding the English Revolution. In his view, a power that did not guarantee the right to property and the protection of life could not have the means to legitimize its exercise. Still in this regard, he clearly stated that a government that did not respect these rights should be legitimately deposed by the population.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

As a general rule, when driving in the city, select atravel lane with the least amount of congestion and stay in the lane you ha

natali 33 [55]

Answer:

As a general rule, when driving in the city, select a travel lane with the least amount of congestion and stay in the lane you have chosen until you need to turn, pass another vehicle, or avoid a hazard.

Explanation:

Many roads contain 2 or more lanes that go in the same direction. When driving on these roads, people who are traveling at low speed should stay in the right lane, allowing others to do it at a higher speed. The lane in which you will drive your vehicle depends on your speed and the factors mentioned above.

6 0

3 years ago

Select two cases in which the Supreme Court incorporated provisions of the Bill of Rights:

Wittaler [7]

Answer:

Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech) it was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, stating that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was stipulated as a First Amendment Revision protecting freedom of expression and freedom of the press to apply in the US states.

Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer) this is a case of the United States Supreme Court. In it, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states are required, under the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, to provide a lawyer to defendants in criminal cases that cannot afford their own lawyers.

4 0

3 years ago

The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by

Phantasy [73]

The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by It is criticized for becoming a justification for intervention on behalf of state interests not related to protection of human rights.

<h3>The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P)?</h3>

All Heads of State and Government endorsed the duty to safeguard populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity at the 2005 World Summit. Three equally important pillars support the responsibility to protect (commonly abbreviated as "R2P"): the obligation of each State to protect its citizens (pillar I); the obligation of the international community to support States in protecting their citizens (pillar II); and the obligation of the international community to act when a State is blatantly failing to protect its citizens (pillar III). When the concept was adopted in 2005, it was a solemn commitment with high hopes for a world free of these atrocities.

There are several circumstances in today's world where populations are at risk of R2P crimes or where such crimes are already occurring. These crises are occurring in a climate of waning internationalism, declining adherence to international human rights and humanitarian law, political division in important decision-making bodies like the Security Council, and a degree of defeatism toward advancing ambitious agendas like protection.
Alarming contempt for core principles of international law has been on display. We are witnessing widespread and egregious attacks on protected civilian sites, such as hospitals and schools, as well as on protected individuals, including humanitarian and health-care workers, in many of the armed conflicts that have broken out in recent years.
The most severe transgressions of international humanitarian and human rights law, which may qualify as atrocity crimes, continue to be committed by the armed forces and auxiliary militia of States, which is a depressing reality given the rise of violent, non-state armed organizations.
Similarly, governments do not hold those responsible for atrocity crimes accountable for their deeds. In order to prevent the investigation and prosecution of atrocity crimes, some States parties to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, are not collaborating with the Court or are even considering withdrawing from the Statute.
The Security Council is becoming less willing to bring issues to the Court, and certain political figures obviously want to avoid being held accountable in court.

Learn more about Protect (R2P) here:

brainly.com/question/16179318

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago