Answer:
trust vs. mistrust
Explanation:
Trust vs. mistrust: This is given by Erik Erikson's in his theory of psychosocial development and is the very first stage. The stage starts from the birth period of the child and lasts till twelve months. In this stage, a child believes that his or her parents or caregivers will provide and fulfill his or her basic needs.
The parent's or caregiver's quick response to the child's needs, then the child will develop the foundation of trust. If in case the needs of a child don't get fulfilled consistently a child may develop suspicion, anxiety, and mistrust.
In the question above, the primary developmental task of the stage described is trust vs. mistrust.
Answer:
Peer acceptance
Explanation:
Peer acceptance is the acceptance for something that may be negative or positive by a person due to peer pressure. It depends on the popularity of the peer groups where a person can maintain a peer relationship. The peer acceptance of relationships is a crucial part of a child's emotional development. Peer acceptance provides a broad range of children's development. This development could be a social relationship, cognitive acceptance, recreation, participating in groups to solve the problems. These groups help children to explore their emotional, social and cognitive development.
Answer:
Parens Patriae
Explanation:
A doctrine that grants the inherent power and authority of the state to protect persons who are legally unable to act on their own behalf.
The parens patriae doctrine has its roots in English Common Law.
In the United States, the parens patriae doctrine has had its greatest application in the treatment of children, mentally ill persons, and other individuals who are legally incompetent to manage their affairs. The state is the supreme guardian of all children within its jurisdiction, and state courts have the inherent power to intervene to protect the best interests of children whose welfare is jeopardized by controversies between parents. This inherent power is generally supplemented by legislative acts that define the scope of child protection in a state.
The state, acting as parens patriae, can make decisions regarding mental health treatment on behalf of one who is mentally incompetent to make the decision on his or her own behalf, but the extent of the state's intrusion is limited to reasonable and necessary treatment.
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
