Answer: I have no idea
Explanation: because I’m not smart
The picture...It’s upside down
This study aims to test within a relatively homogeneous group of small states what
differentiates the growth performance of Pacific island countries (PICs) from their peers. We
find that PICs are disadvantaged by distance and hampered by lower investment and exports
compared with other small island states, but greater political stability, catch-up effects from
lower initial incomes, and slower population growth have helped offset some of these
disadvantages. On balance, policy-related factors, together with geography-related
disadvantages, have led to growth rates in PICs that are much lower than in other small states.
We also examine how real exchange rate appreciation, unfavorable developments in the
external trade environment, and rising international transport costs may have contributed to
PICs’ slower growth over the past decade.
This could have a variety of impacts that this situation could have on the local market. Firstly, the introduction of a Chinese company would mean that there would more competition for the American solar power company which would then have to contend with the Chinese company for sales. They would then be in a race to bring the most affordable options to the consumers as well as new advances in the technology or greater service. This would mean that the consumers would benefit greatly from this situation as they would be getting better products and service for an affordable cost.
Also, both companies could have a working arrangement where they act as an oligopoly and dominate the solar power industry in that particular market. Although, more companies brings more competition, when there aren't a multiplicity of competitors, there is always the danger that the few businesses will band together and operate as one entity where they set specific prices, standards of service and technological advances introduced. They would only superficially be competing with each other. In this arrangement, the consumers would endure the same standard as having one entity dominating the market.
Another scenario would be where the American solar power company makes a superior product and as such would promote their products to the market as 'higher end' which would ensure they have a core and stable consumer base.
True. Exaggeration, deception, and suppression of material facts pertaining to the property or the transaction are all prohibited by the code of ethics.
A code of ethics outlines the moral principles and best practices that an organization should adhere to in order, to be honest, ethical, and professional. If an organization's members violate the code of ethics, there may be consequences, including firing.
About Article 2, anyone is not required to find hidden flaws in the property, to provide advice on subjects beyond the realm of their expertise, or to divulge information that is private or secret in the context of agency or non-agency interactions as those terms are defined by state law.
For the purposes of Article 2, factors that are categorised by law or regulation as "non-material" or that expressly state they are exempt from disclosure are not deemed to be "pertinent."
Learn more about the code of ethics here:
brainly.com/question/14914455
#SPJ1