The European and Asian immigrant experiences were much different during the early 20th century. One of the most significant examples were the procedures they had to go through in order to gain access to America.
For example, many Europeans came through Ellis Island (located in NY). This resulted in rounds of questioning, a six second medical exam, a citizenship like test, and mental evaluations. For Asian immigrants, they came through Ellis Island (located in San Francisco). These immigrants were subject to humiliating physical exams, that sometimes took several hours and forced them to be without clothes in front of other individuals.
European immigrants, for the most part, had a much easier time entering the US. Asian immigrants were limited based on the Chinese Exclusion Act, which suspended the immigration of Chinese immigrants into America for roughly a decade.
Answer:
Natural rights and popular sovereignty
Explanation:
In relation to democracy, natural rights are each individual person's right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (if based on Thomas Jefferson's ideals, life liberty and property if based on John Locke's ideals) which are pretty important as they give each person their indivudual freedoms. Poplar sovereugnty basically means that elected representatives get their power from the consent of the people, which most modern day democracys rely on to stay functioning effectively.
Practicing tolerance and inclusion, and invited religious debates was a characteristic of the Mughal ruler Akbar in terms of his attitude toward religion.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
India was invaded and ruled by many foreign rulers and one such empire was Mughal Empire. They had many rulers who had ruled India in 16th& 17th centuries but Emperor Akbar is revered as one of the greatest ruler of the world.
Unlike other Mughal rulers, he believed in religious tolerance and treated people of all faith and religions as equal. He often used to call people of great wisdom belonging to different religions and hold debates in his court. He removed the Jizya which was a religious tax imposed on non-Muslims and send the message of equality.
<span>he defended himself against the charges by saying the bible can never be wrong because its true meaning is understood also he says the bible is very much complex in several ways
Really hope this helps I´ve read about Galileo before</span>
